Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Water is a basic unit of life and it is essential for all living organisms. Therefore, it is a necessity for all the humans to have clean water free of cost. This essay agrees that clean water should be provided free of charge.

Firstly, clean water is a basic human right as it keeps us alive and hydrated. So, no one should pay for something this basic. Moreover, clean water is also require for bathing, cleaning and washing, which makes water an inevitable dependency. For instance, an average person uses clean water around 5 times a day. So, paying for clean water can become quite expensive for people.

Secondly, clean water is a basic requirement which means it should not be a luxury only elite can afford. While some people argue that it is costly for the government to supply clean water as clean water is running out and most people waste clean water, nevertheless, recycling water can be a budget friendly option. Furthermore, seawater can be a great recycling option via water desalination plants, as we know 70% of Earth contains water.

In conclusion, it is important to acknowledge that people do not value clean water and use it mindlessly, but with proper education, people can learn how valuble clean water is. While it is expensive to build water desalination plants as lots of machineries are required, nevertheless, it is beneficial in the long term, This essay agrees that clean water should be made freeto everyone, as it is a essential for living.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by clearly stating a position that clean water should be provided free of charge. The main ideas are relevant, including arguments surrounding human rights, health, and economic sustainability through water desalination and recycling. However, some arguments lack deep extension; for instance, the mention that an average person uses clean water around five times a day is a weak, undeveloped empirical claim. Furthermore, the counter-argument regarding government costs is introduced and dismissed a bit abruptly in the second and third body paragraphs. Overall, all parts of the task are addressed, placing the response solidly in the Band 6 territory.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear stance established in the introduction and reinforced in the conclusion. Paragraphing is utilised appropriately to separate main ideas. Cohesive devices are employed to signal transitions, such as 'Firstly', 'Secondly', 'Moreover', and 'In conclusion'. However, referencing and transitions are at times mechanical or slightly repetitive, notably with the phrase 'nevertheless' being overused ('nevertheless, recycling water can be a budget friendly option' and 'nevertheless, it is beneficial in the long term'). Logical progression is maintained, but cohesion requires more flexibility to achieve a higher band.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, successfully communicating the student's ideas. There are attempts to use less common items and subject-specific terminology, such as 'desalination plants', 'essential', and 'inevitable dependency'. However, there are noticeable lexical errors, such as spelling mistakes ('valuble' instead of valuable, 'freeto' instead of free to, 'machineries' where machinery is uncountable), and awkward word forms like 'essential for living' missing a noun. These inaccuracies prevent the score from reaching a Band 7, as word choice and spelling flaws occasionally require the reader to adjust.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writer demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating conditional-style structures and relative clauses. There are several grammatical errors and punctuation slips throughout the response, such as missing articles ('clean water is also require' instead of required, 'is a essential' instead of an essential), agreement errors ('all the humans' instead of all humans), and a comma splice in the final sentence ('long term, This essay agrees'). Despite these frequent minor errors, they rarely impede overall communication, ensuring that the grammar comfortably meets the Band 6 descriptors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.