Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Water is a basic unit of life and it is essential for all living organisms. Therefore, it is a necessity for all the humans to have clean water free of cost. This essay agrees that clean water should be provided free of charge.

Firstly, clean water is a basic human right as it keeps us alive and hydrated. So, no one should pay for something this basic. Moreover, clean water is also require for bathing, cleaning and washing, which makes water an inevitable dependency. For instance, an average person uses clean water around 5 times a day. So, paying for clean water can become quite expensive for people.

Secondly, clean water is a basic requirement which means it should not be a luxury only elite can afford. While some people argue that it is costly for the government to supply clean water as clean water is running out and most people waste clean water, nevertheless, recycling water can be a budget-friendly option. Furthermore, seawater can be a great recycling option via water desalination plants, as we know 70% of the Earth contains water.

In conclusion, it is important to acknowledge that people do not value clean water and use it mindlessly, but with proper education, people can learn how valuable clean water is. While it is expensive to build water desalination plants as a lot of machinery is required, nevertheless, it is beneficial in the long term, This essay agrees that clean water should be made freeto everyone, as it is essential for living

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt directly by taking a clear position that clean water should be provided free of charge. The main body paragraphs present relevant arguments, such as the fundamental nature of water for human survival, alongside counter-arguments regarding government costs and water wastage, offering solutions like recycling and desalination plants. While the ideas are generally relevant and supported, some points, such as the claim that an average person uses clean water around 5 times a day, lack precision and depth. Overall, the task is addressed adequately, fitting the criteria for Band 6.0 as it covers all parts of the task with some under-developed ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraphing, introduction, and conclusion. Cohesive devices are used to signal progression, such as 'Firstly', 'Secondly', 'Moreover', and 'In conclusion'. However, referencing and cohesive links are sometimes mechanical or repetitive, notably with the frequent, slightly clumsy transitions ('nevertheless', 'Furthermore') that affect the flow. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate ideas, but within paragraphs, the logical progression could be smoother. This corresponds to the Band 6 descriptor where cohesion is sometimes faulty or mechanical.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, incorporating topic-specific terms such as 'organisms', 'desalination plants', and 'dependency'. There are several attempts to use less common vocabulary, though this is sometimes accompanied by word-choice and collocation errors, such as 'basic unit of life' instead of 'source of life', and 'freeto everyone' (spacing error). Spelling is generally accurate, but limitations in range and occasional inaccuracies in word formation or phrasing keep the lexical resource at a Band 6 level.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. The writer attempts complex structures using dependent clauses and conjunctions (e.g., 'While some people argue that...', '...as we know 70% of the Earth contains water'). However, there are noticeable grammatical errors and awkward phrasings, such as 'is also require' instead of 'is also required', missing articles, and a run-on sentence structure in the conclusion ('...long term, This essay agrees...'). Punctuation slips are also present. These errors do not impede communication, placing the response solidly in the Band 6 category.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.