Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Water is a basic unit of life and it is essential for all living organisms. Therefore, it is a necessity for all the humans to have clean water free of cost. This essay agrees that clean water should be provided free of charge.
Firstly, clean water is a basic human right as it keeps us alive and hydrated. So, no one should pay for something this basic. Moreover, clean water is also required for bathing, cleaning and washing, which makes water an inevitable necessity. For instance, an average person uses clean water around 5 times a day. So, paying for clean water can become quite expensive for people.
Secondly, clean water is a basic requirement which means it should not be a luxury only elite can afford. While some people argue that it is costly for the government to supply clean water as clean water is running out and most people waste clean water, nevertheless, recycling water can be a budget-friendly option. Furthermore, seawater can be a great recycling option via water desalination plants, as we know 70% of the Earth contains water.
In conclusion, it is important to acknowledge that people do not value clean water and use it mindlessly, but with proper education, people can learn how valuable clean water is. While it is expensive to build water desalination plants as lots of machineries are required. nevertheless, it is beneficial in the long term, This essay agrees that clean water should be made freeto everyone, as it is essential for living
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The response addresses the prompt directly by taking a clear position that clean water should be provided free of charge. Main ideas are introduced regarding human rights, economic feasibility, and water scarcity solutions such as desalination. While some arguments, such as the claim that 'an average person uses clean water around 5 times a day,' are slightly simplistic and under-developed, the writer successfully covers all parts of the task. The position is maintained throughout the essay and supported by relevant examples and reasoning, aligning well with the Band 6.0 or Band 6.5 descriptors.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear introduction and conclusion. Paragraphing is utilised effectively, dividing the main body points into distinct arguments regarding human rights and economic considerations. Cohesive devices such as 'Firstly,' 'Secondly,' 'Moreover,' and 'Furthermore' are employed to structure the response, though some transitions are a bit mechanical or repetitive. Referencing is generally clear, and the logical progression from the problem of cost to potential solutions via desalination is easy to follow.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
The student demonstrates an adequate vocabulary range suitable for the task, attempting some less common lexical items such as 'inevitable necessity,' 'budget-friendly,' and 'desalination plants.' However, there are occasional word choice and spelling inaccuracies, such as writing 'machineries' (machinery is uncountable) and 'freeto' (missing a space). Communication is never impeded by these lexical slips, and the terminology related to water conservation and public utilities is generally applied well.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating subordinating clauses such as 'While some people argue that...' and 'as we know 70% of the Earth contains water.' There are some grammatical errors and punctuation issues, notably comma splices in sentences like 'nevertheless, it is beneficial in the long term, This essay agrees...' and missing punctuation in the final sentence. However, the majority of simple sentences are accurate, and errors do not impede overall comprehension.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.