Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Now a days the pure miniral water is available but not free of cost, althouth we knoe that it is the basic need for all human civilization. I firmly believe that it should be eassy to access for all individuals without any coast, it makes our envirnment healthy and increase our economy growth.

First of all, if everybody drink mineral the all disease keep away our popolation. Which makes our envirment healthy and clean. It is say that are many disease are usually comes from water now a day because of development. Human grow day by day but they can't see the distruction what they have done, so atleast we should provide pure mineral water all individual. For example, if governemt provided the clean water without any ups and downs, the people who live their autoamticaly be healthy and keep away from various type of waterborn disease.

Secondly, they suply of mineral water helps the people to work more, because they feel healthier than the earlier. For this piont, it means it directly increase our economy growth and make a country to show their in global community. It also greate effect on our life span which is another factor of succes. For example, if everybody drink healthy the are able to more work in entire life.

In nutshell, i would like to say that if the nation want to be make our people healthier and economy great, they need to give a clean water to every individual. Which will take the people of this nation far ahead of the people of other nations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position regarding whether clean water should be provided free of charge to every home. Relevant ideas are introduced, such as health benefits and economic growth, aligning with the expected band level. However, some ideas are under-developed or remain somewhat repetitive and simplistic. For instance, the argument regarding economic growth is briefly mentioned in the second body paragraph as 'it directly increase our economy growth' without deep elaboration or specific examples explaining the causal link. The progression of ideas is present, but to move further, the writer needs to extend supporting points with more thorough explanations and fully realized examples rather than generalized statements.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear attempt to structure the response into an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used adequately to separate distinct main points. However, cohesion is sometimes faulty or mechanical, and referencing is not always completely clear. For example, transition markers like 'First of all,' and 'Secondly,' help guide the reader through the main points, but internal ties within paragraphs show weaknesses, such as 'For this piont, it means it directly increase...' which disrupts the natural flow of ideas. To achieve a higher level, the writer must ensure that cohesive devices are used more smoothly and that referencing words clearly link back to their intended antecedents without causing ambiguity.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common items such as 'civilization', 'distruction', and 'waterborn disease'. However, there are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, including 'miniral', 'althouth', 'knoe', 'eassy', 'coast', 'envirnment', 'popolation', 'governemt', 'autoamticaly', 'suply', 'greate', and 'succes'. These lexical and orthographic inaccuracies occasionally draw attention, although they generally do not prevent the core message from being understood. To reach a higher standard, the writer needs to expand control over word forms and improve spelling accuracy significantly while employing a more varied and precise range of academic vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some capability to construct multi-clause sentences, such as 'if everybody drink mineral the all disease keep away our popolation.' Nevertheless, the response contains frequent errors in grammar and sentence structure that frequently impede communication and place the text in the lower band range. There are multiple issues with subject-verb agreement, such as 'the all disease keep away', tense inconsistencies like 'is say that are many disease are usually comes', missing articles, and awkward prepositional or clausal patterns. Furthermore, punctuation is inconsistent. To improve, the student must focus heavily on foundational sentence construction, verb form accuracy, and eliminating recurring basic grammatical errors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.