Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Drinking water plays a paramount role in the world. There is an argued that having access to clean and safe water is a fundamental right for every individual. Hence, Government should ensure that every household receives a free of cost water supply. I partially agree with this statement because it is not practical solution to provide water completely free of charge as people can do more water wastage, water treatment are much expensive to claim.

To commence with, clean water should be affordable for the household people as it basic essential need for drinking, cooking and hygiene as low income household could recieve a minimum amount of safe water without charge. Furthermore, free water access can also protect public health owing to providing clean water reduces water-borne diseases this can also alleviate pressure on healthcare system by preventing illness.

On the flip side, water treatment, pipelines, maintenance and purification are much expensive for legal authorities that's why giving free water is problematic. If nobody pays cost then governing system must cover the entire amount through taxes leading to financial burden on public budgets. Epitome, when something having zero charge, people may use it carelessly by wasting them mostly this can seen in the houses they would not pay attention on closing water taps if buckets are already full or so on.

In the conclusion, basic access to clean water should be allocated to everone. However, providing an unlimited supply of water without charge is impractical. For that balance of allowance and payment on additional consumption should be applicable on the water usage.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response successfully addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position that balances the idea of free basic water with the impracticality of an entirely unlimited free supply. The main ideas are relevant and generally well-developed, such as distinguishing between basic human needs and excessive waste, but some points remain slightly under-developed, particularly the specific threshold for consumption. The writer moves beyond a simple 'yes' or 'no' stance to offer a nuanced middle ground, which demonstrates the elements of higher-band performance while retaining some typical limitations in depth for the main body arguments.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The text presents a coherent overall arrangement with a logical progression of ideas from introduction to conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate different facets of the argument, such as public health benefits versus financial burdens. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical or faulty, as seen in transitions like 'To commence with' and 'Epitome, when something having zero charge'. Referencing is not always entirely clear, and cohesive devices are occasionally overused or awkward in phrasing, which prevents the essay from achieving a higher level of seamless integration.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to communicate their perspective on a complex topic. There are clear attempts to use less common items and subject-specific vocabulary such as 'water-borne diseases', 'financial burden', and 'legal authorities'. However, there are noticeable word-choice and word-form errors that reflect a limited range, such as 'water treatment are much expensive', 'household people', and 'wasting them mostly this can seen'. These errors do not seriously impede communication, but they restrict the lexical score by demonstrating inconsistency in collocation and precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The writing exhibits a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating an attempt at varied syntactic structures through clauses connected with 'because', 'although', and relative pronouns. However, there are numerous errors in grammar and punctuation, including missing articles ('Government should ensure', 'as it basic essential need'), incorrect verb forms ('when something having zero charge'), and awkward prepositional usage. While these errors rarely impede overall communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent the grammar from reaching a higher band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.