Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

From the bigging of the human evolution water is the essential part for the survival of mankind. For that reason, to have an access of clean water is a basic human right, and however without any charges or tax people do not give value a water and waste it.

On the firstly hand, Water is the very crucial part of the human because mankind could not survive without water because it's a source of life, unlike other goods for every food every substitute is available but for water there is no substitute exist. Furthermore, without water normal human can't survive for even 72 hours. So, for that reason charging water is indirectly harmful for low-income household. To illustrate that, Countries like south Africa and India's remote region where water supply is very low and difficult have the large number of health issues. For that reasons water should be free of charge and must have supply chain for remote areas.

On the other hand, to build a system for water supply chain it is a very costly for government. To build a system it needs water treatment, pipelines, and maintenance cost for sustain and it cost significant money. For that reason, water should have tax or chargers. Secondly, without any charges, people will waste water and will not value it. So, having a little cost or tax for water is very necessary for a reason.

In conclusion, I partially agree that water should be free of cost in light of human health and basic human right, even so there should be low margin tax or cost because of it is very costly for governments for maintenance of pipelines and water treatment.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task and presents a clear position throughout, which leans toward a partial agreement. Relevant ideas are introduced regarding both the necessity of free water for human health and the economic realities of maintaining supply systems. However, some ideas are under-developed or lack full extension. For instance, the mention of South Africa and India lacks specific detail to fully support the argument on health issues. The response successfully meets the requirements of the lower band by addressing the prompt and showing elements of the next band through well-chosen counterarguments regarding government costs, but falls slightly short of full development in supporting examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response maintains a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraphing, dividing the introduction, two body paragraphs, and the conclusion appropriately. Cohesive devices are used to signal progression, such as 'On the firstly hand,' 'Furthermore,' and 'In conclusion.' However, cohesion is at times mechanical or faulty, as seen in awkward transitions and referencing issues like 'people do not give value a water.' Paragraphing is used sufficiently, but logical progression between sentences within paragraphs could be smoother to reach a higher level of cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, attempting less common items such as 'substitute,' 'maintenance,' and 'water treatment.' However, there are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors that detract from precision, such as 'bigging' instead of beginning, 'give value a water,' and 'chargers' instead of charges. These errors do not seriously impede communication, but they reflect a limited and developing lexical range. To improve, the writer needs to enhance collocation awareness and reduce spelling inaccuracies when attempting more ambitious academic vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some attempt at subordination and relative clauses. However, there are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation throughout the text. Issues include incorrect article usage ('an access of clean water', 'the essential part'), prepositions ('charging water', 'cost for government'), subject-verb agreement ('it cost significant money'), and awkward phrasing ('because of it is very costly'). These errors require some effort from the reader to parse, placing the grammar firmly in the lower range where frequent errors persist alongside mixed sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.