Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

Access to clean and safe water is an essential human need, and some people believe that every household should receive a free supply of water. Although providing water completely free of charge could place a financial burden on governments and encourage wasteful consumption, it would ensure that everyone has access to this basic necessity. I agree that every home should have access to free clean water because this can protect public health and support low-income households.

On the one hand, providing free water create financial and environmental problems. Governments would have to spend substantial amount of public money on water treatment, infrastructure, maintenance and distribution. This could place preasure on national debt, particularly in developing countries where governments already struggle to provide other essential facilities. Moreover, people may be less carefull about their consumption if they do not have to pay for water, leading to unnecessary waste and greater pressure on limited resources. For example, households might leave taps running or use excessive water for gardening and cleaning. However, I do not completely agree because governments can introduce resonable usage limits to prevent wastage while providing a basic amount of water with no charge.

On the other hand, availability of free water can protect public health and can promote social equality. Filter water is essential for drinking, cooking, washing and maintaining proper hygiene, so people should not be denied it because of financial difficulties. This is specifically important for low-income families who do not afford because of the monetary instability. For instance, a poor family could obtain sufficient water for drinking and sanitation without having to choose between paying a water bill and purchasing food or medicine. Therefore, I agree with this view because access to safer water should be guanteed to everyone.

In conclusion, although free water could increase governments expenditure and encourage waste, I believe every household should receive a basic supply of clean water free of cost. This is because it is a part and parcel for health and hygiene and can protect vulnerable members of society.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5

The response addresses all parts of the task with a clear position maintained throughout. The student successfully outlines both sides of the argument—the potential financial and environmental drawbacks of free water versus the public health and social equality benefits—and synthesizes these into a coherent final stance. Ideas are well-extended and supported with relevant explanations, such as mentioning infrastructure maintenance and the plight of low-income families. However, there is a slight tendency to over-generalise in parts, such as assuming all developing nations would face immediate debt pressure. To push toward the highest level, ideas could be even more fully developed with precise, nuanced real-world examples rather than broader hypothetical scenarios.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay displays clear logical organization and a definite progression of ideas from introduction to conclusion. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately, with each body paragraph dedicated to a distinct viewpoint introduced by clear transitional markers like 'On the one hand' and 'On the other hand'. Cohesive devices are used flexibly overall, guiding the reader smoothly through the arguments. Nevertheless, referencing is occasionally slightly repetitive or mechanical in its transitions, preventing the flow from becoming entirely natural and unobtrusive. Improving the variety of cohesive links rather than relying on standard formulaic phrases would elevate this aspect further.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

The writer demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully attempting less common items such as 'infrastructure', 'social equality', and 'vulnerable members'. However, there are some noticeable vocabulary and spelling errors, such as 'preasure' instead of pressure, 'carefull' instead of careful, 'resonable' instead of reasonable, 'Filter water' instead of Filtered water, and 'guanteed' instead of guaranteed. While these errors do not impede communication, they reflect a lack of precision that keeps the lexical score in the mid-range. To achieve a higher band, the student needs to demonstrate greater control over less common lexical items and ensure accurate word formation and spelling.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

The essay features a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating a decent command of syntactic structures through conditional-like clauses and subordinate clauses such as 'Although providing water completely free of charge could place...'. There is good control of overall punctuation, but several grammatical errors persist, particularly with articles, plurals, and prepositions inside patterns, such as 'providing free water create' (subject-verb agreement), 'substantial amount' (missing article/pluralization), 'with no charge' (preposition choice), and 'do not afford because of' (missing object). These are typical errors that occur when attempting more complex phrasing. To improve, the student should focus on tighter grammatical accuracy and consistency in sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.