Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

undoubtedly, human's fundamental rights confirms the right to clean water for every individual. Although, in this contemporary era many of the proponents believed that even nowadays population is unable to claim clean and and fresh water which deteriorates the fundamental right closure. In upcoming essay this topic will explore it's disclosure and the necessary steps to provide fresh water to every individual.

To begin with, there are numerous reasons behind this unhealthy water treatment and the most prominent ine is the poor water management by the state. To elabore it, no proper water managing services are available to the citizen eventually contributes to degrade the quality of water. Furthermore, civilian also damages the pipeline by putting garbage over the substantial water storage area which finally clogz the wayer pipeline and keep them rusted leads to damage the water pH level and makes it often smelly. For an instance, in India, specifically Mumbai Dharavi is the gigantic example of population living over the unhealthy and contaminated iquality of water and getting ill due to pathogens and bacterias present in it.

However, some necessary pount can be checked out to perfect the water quality such as, using chlorine in water. To explore, the water managing service can use chlorinated cleaning in water storages which make sure that storing container zhould not get deteriorate. Additionally, a galvanization process can be taken under process to get rid of rust in water storages. Moreover, the the civilian can also contribute bya using personalised water filters such as automated or calcium powered water filters.

In conclusion, water quality is the crucial point from the drinking perspective and food cooking process. These degrading water qualities all over the world can be vandalize by using proper cleaning and supervising the storing containers. All this just because water is the necessity to every living individual present in this world, which ultimately makes water a essential superiority for everyone and not to damage it, healthier the water quality, longer the run cycle for upcoming generations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response addresses the task only minimally, resulting in a low score for this criterion. While the writer touches upon the broad topic of water availability, the central prompt—whether every home should have a water supply provided free of charge—is not properly discussed or answered with a clear position. The introduction outlines an essay disclosure rather than taking a definitive stance on the prompt, and the body paragraphs wander into general issues of water management and purification methods rather than addressing the economic principle of free water provision. Ideas are limited and under-developed, relying on vague generalisations such as mentioning Mumbai Dharavi as a gigantic example without effectively connecting it back to the specific question of whether water ought to be free for all households.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

There is some organisation evident in the essay, with a clear attempt to structure the writing into an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, there is no clear overall progression of argument, and the connections between ideas often feel disjointed. Cohesive devices are frequently inadequate, inaccurate, or overused, such as transitional phrases like 'To explore' and 'All this just because', which sound unnatural and do not link clauses smoothly. Paragraphing is attempted, but the internal logical flow within paragraphs is frequently disrupted by awkward referencing and abrupt shifts in topic, such as moving from state water management directly to civilian actions without a clear transitional bridge.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for conveying basic ideas. There are noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and spelling throughout the text, such as 'ine' instead of 'one', 'elabore' instead of 'elaborate', 'clogz' instead of 'clogs', and 'iquality' instead of 'quality'. The student attempts to use some less common vocabulary, such as 'galvanization', 'pathogens', and 'proponents', but these attempts are frequently marred by inaccuracies in collocation and context. These lexical slips and spelling mistakes cause some difficulty for the reader and prevent the response from achieving a higher band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on basic sentence forms with frequent attempts at complex structures that are often faulty. There are persistent errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and prepositions inside grammatical patterns, such as 'human's fundamental rights confirms', 'many of the proponents believed', and 'the civilian can also contribute bya using'. Punctuation errors are also present, including comma splices and incorrect capitalization. These frequent errors cause considerable difficulty for the reader and mean that error-free sentences are rare.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.