Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Water is one of the basic human rights. Many people opine that the government should supply water for free, while others claim that water supply should be paid as well as there should be some rules and regulations in water usage. Although water is a basic human right, i personally believe that water supply should not be free of cost.

First of all, people around the world use water in their everyday life. If they are allowed to use water for free, there is a substantial chance that people misuse water which can lead us to a serious water shortage crisis. However, the govenrment should be charged a limitied amount of money for water so that every citizen can comfortably afford the cost. On top of that, policymakers should take effective measures to aware individuals about the consequences of water wastage.

goverment water safe supply and regulation korar jonno taka khoroch kore > water supply ak dhoroner business > ata akta open secret and modern country gula te ata common > ate kore country gula valo lav kore jei tana unnoyon ar kaje bebohar korte pare > for example > saudi sagor theke manush sodhon kore manush k dey , and taka earn kore

On the other hand, governments all over the world allocates massive funds to regulate pure and safe water supply for the citizens. Water management and supply is one sort of business for the government bodies around the world, which is also an open secret and quite common in this contemporary era. Undoubtedly, goventments generate a massive income by charging for water. And so, they can use the profit for the well being of their countries.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the government should take considerable steps to aware people about water usage and charge very minimum so that people from all stage can afford water and use water properly.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by expressing a clear position that water supply should not be provided entirely free of cost, presenting relevant ideas such as the risk of misuse and the operational costs incurred by governments. However, the development of these ideas remains limited and under-developed. For instance, the point regarding government revenue generation is repeated across paragraphs without significant extension or deep exploration. Additionally, the inclusion of non-English notes in the middle of the text indicates a lack of complete task execution and focus. To reach a higher level, the writer needs to fully develop all parts of the prompt with well-supported arguments and fully thought-out examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay displays some overall organization with standard paragraph breaks and basic cohesive devices such as 'First of all', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion'. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression and logical flow, compounded by an abrupt intrusion of foreign notes that disrupts the structure. Referencing and logical transitions between ideas are occasionally faulty or mechanical, leading to disjointed movement from one point to the next. To improve, the writer must ensure that every sentence flows naturally into the next with precise and varied cohesive devices, maintaining a unified progression throughout the response.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to convey basic concepts related to water management and government policy. There are noticeable lexical errors, such as 'aware individuals' instead of 'make individuals aware', 'govenrment' spelling errors, and awkward phrasing like 'from all stage' instead of 'from all walks of life' or 'all social strata'. These errors and limited lexical range cause some difficulty and prevent the response from achieving a more precise style. To advance, the writer needs to employ a wider range of vocabulary with greater accuracy in word choice, collocation, and word formation.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The essay demonstrates a limited range of sentence structures, relying heavily on basic patterns with occasional attempts at complex sentences that often turn out faulty. There are frequent grammatical errors, including issues with subject-verb agreement and preposition use, such as 'the govenrment should be charged a limitied amount' where passive voice is misused, and 'allocates massive funds' where singular-plural agreement is inconsistent. These frequent errors cause some difficulty for the reader. To achieve a higher score, the writer must demonstrate better control over complex grammar patterns, accurate tense and voice selection, and error-free sentence construction.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.