Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-04
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Right to Pure water is a fundamental human right,For this reason,every house should have a water supply without any payment.i agree to this statement because water is essential in daily life, in the following paragraphs i will expatiate more.
To begin with,Water is an essential commodity in life,for instance water is needed for cooking, drinking and for fishing, therefore individual uses it daily and it should be free.
Government and stakeholders should ensure clean water is been supplied to the community in order to make life more easier for people they rule over,such as providing a bole whole water ,tap water to the society, prevention of water pollution by creating a drainage system for factories and perform monthly environmental sanitation qith the involvement of the community leaders for safe water.
Futhermore,A clean water promote good health, as well as prevention of certain medication conditions,for example cholera, diarrhoea and typhoid,unsafe water increases the chances of having the aforementioned diseases which resulted from drinking uncleaned water and may result in other complications such as hypovolemic shock,liver disease and death.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response addresses the prompt by stating an agreement with the idea that clean water should be free, presenting limited and under-developed ideas. While the writer mentions the necessity of water for daily life and health benefits such as preventing cholera and typhoid, these points lack deep extension or concrete examples from personal experience. Furthermore, the length requirement is not met, as the response contains only 177 words, falling significantly short of the 250-word minimum. To reach a higher band, the writer must fully develop all ideas with extended explanations and examples, while ensuring the minimum word count is satisfied.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a discernible introduction and body paragraphs, though progression is sometimes hindered by abrupt transitions and a lack of cohesive devices. Paragraphing is attempted, but the grouping of ideas can be disjointed, such as combining community supply methods and sanitation measures into a single body paragraph. Referencing is occasionally unclear, and transitional phrases like 'To begin with' and 'Futhermore' are used mechanically. To improve, the writer needs to ensure smoother logical progression between sentences and paragraphs, utilizing a wider and more natural range of cohesive devices without repetition.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate for the task, featuring basic terms alongside attempts at less common vocabulary such as 'expatiate', 'commodity', and 'hypovolemic shock'. However, there are noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and spelling, such as 'bole whole' instead of 'borehole', 'uncleaned' instead of 'unclean', and 'qith' instead of 'with'. These lexical inaccuracies and spelling slips occasionally cause slight strain for the reader. To achieve a higher band, the student should expand their lexical range, ensure correct word formation, and minimize spelling mistakes by proofreading their writing carefully.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The writer demonstrates a limited range of structures, relying mostly on simple sentences with frequent attempts at complex forms that are often faulty. There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, and capitalization, including missing capital letters at the beginning of sentences and after periods, incorrect pronoun capitalization such as 'i agree', and comma splices like 'human right,For this reason'. Additionally, subject-verb agreement issues and article omissions are present, such as 'A clean water promote'. These frequent errors can cause some difficulty for the reader. To improve, the writer must work on mastering basic sentence boundaries, punctuation rules, and maintaining grammatical accuracy across complex sentence structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.