Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadyas, it is often argued that filtered water should be supplied to each house by the authorities at no cost. In my opinion, this should be the Government's responsibility to ensure accessibility of clean water to every individual.

To begin with, when structuring the cities it should be made sure that every landscape has proper pipes for filtered water coming from the city's water center, so, that no one deprives of the basic human right. As as result, this will decrease unnecessary stress for community. Furthermore, there are few unemployed folks who can not afford so much, lacks in providing clean water to their family by considering it not pivotal. Hence, their family becomes prone to other health issues and diseases by consuming infiltered water, therefore this will burden them with other expenses which they can not afford at the moment due to lack of money.

Moreover, every developed nation has defined this as the basic human right because our taxes are being payed to the Government. So, people should get this right without any doubt, because this makes country clean and disease free. This, therefore, leaves a headache at the authorities end to some extent because they have to pay for the individuals.

In conclusion, I would like to argue that states should provide free clean water to masses in oreder to run a well managed country. It can not be denied that this burdens the officials with extra charges, but this can be minimised if, elites contribute to water fund on their own.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task and presents a clear position throughout, arguing that the government should provide free clean water to every home. The main ideas are generally relevant, fulfilling the requirements for the mid-band level. However, some ideas are under-developed or lack full extension. For instance, the point regarding unemployed citizens who cannot afford clean water is introduced but not fully explored with specific supporting examples or logical consequences. Similarly, the suggestion that elites should contribute to a water fund in the conclusion appears abruptly without prior development. To reach a higher level, the writer needs to expand on all main arguments with deeper explanations and more robust supporting evidence.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear progression of ideas across paragraphs, using basic transitional markers such as 'To begin with', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion'. Paragraphing is used logically to separate the introduction, body arguments, and conclusion. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical or faulty. For example, referencing and linking within sentences occasionally feel awkward, as seen in the phrase 'so, that no one deprives' and the punctuation misuse around cohesive devices. To achieve a higher score, the writer must ensure that cohesive devices connect ideas more smoothly and naturally without disrupting the flow of the sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The student displays an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common words and phrases such as 'accessibility', 'pivotal', and 'disease free'. However, there are noticeable lexical errors, awkward word choices, and spelling mistakes throughout the text. Examples include 'Nowadyas' for nowadays, 'infiltered' instead of unfiltered, and the incorrect collocation 'leaves a headache at the authorities end'. Furthermore, phrasing such as 'taxes are being payed' reveals spelling and word form inaccuracies. These errors do not completely impede communication, but they restrict the score because precision and natural collocation are lacking.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over grammar. There are, however, frequent errors in punctuation, articles, prepositions, and verb forms that prevent the essay from achieving a higher mark. Examples of structural and grammatical inaccuracies include 'when structuring the cities it should be made sure', 'no one deprives of the basic human right', 'As as result', and 'in oreder to run a well managed country'. While these errors rarely completely impede the reader's understanding, the presence of frequent grammatical slips across various sentence structures means the writing sits firmly within the mid-band category.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.