Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-06
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Access to clean water is truly fundamental right of human being. I strongly believe that every home should have adequate amount of water and pure water that are safe to use and drinkable. However, I do believe that all household should have water supply free of charge as water is basic essential to survival of human and it can improve health.
On the one hand, water is necessary for everyone’s daily life. People need it for drinking, cooking, washing and maintaining personal hygiene. If water is costly then poor families cannot afford it for their basic needs. This could lead to serious health problems, including diseases caused by poor sanitation and the consumption of unsafe water. Therefore, providing water without charge would ensure that every person can enjoy a basic standard of living.
On the other hand, some people argue that free water could lead to unnecessary consumption and place a financial burden on governments. If people do not have to pay for water, they may waste it by using excessive amounts for gardening, washing cars or other non-essential activities. In addition, governments have to spend a large amount of money on water treatment, pipelines and maintenance.
In conclusion, although there are some disadvantages to providing free water, I strongly believe that every home should have access to a free supply because clean water is essential for human life and should not depend on a person's ability to pay. However, I believe these problems can be managed through proper government regulations.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
The response addresses all parts of the task and presents a clear position throughout, acknowledging both sides of the debate regarding free water supply while maintaining a stance in favor of it. However, some ideas are more fully developed than others. For instance, the arguments concerning the health benefits of clean water and the economic concerns of governments are presented with relevant support, yet they remain somewhat generalized rather than fully extended. The discussion touches upon essential elements required for a balanced essay, but to move higher, the arguments need deeper elaboration with more specific explanations and concrete examples.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear organizational structure. Information and ideas are logically sequenced, moving from an introduction outlining the writer's stance into separate body paragraphs addressing opposing viewpoints, and finishing with a cohesive conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct aspects of the prompt. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion' are employed to guide the reader through the argument, although referencing is occasionally a little mechanical, which prevents the essay from achieving a fully seamless flow.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, successfully conveying the writer's meaning. There are attempts to use less common items such as 'personal hygiene', 'sanitation', and 'non-essential activities'. However, there are noticeable limitations and inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'fundamental right of human being' missing necessary articles, and 'adequate amount of water and pure water' which sounds repetitive. Spelling and word-choice errors do not seriously impede communication, but they restrict the lexical score, showing that a wider and more precise range of vocabulary is needed for higher bands.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over sentence structure with attempts at subordination. However, there are several errors in grammar and punctuation throughout the text, including missing articles ('fundamental right', 'survival of human'), subject-verb agreement issues ('all household should have'), and awkward phrasing ('every home should have adequate amount of water and pure water that are safe'). While these errors rarely impede communication, they persist across the text, preventing the response from demonstrating the frequent error-free sentences required at higher performance levels.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.