Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Water is a basic human requirement without which a life can not be imagined, due to which I agree that every household must have basic facility which includes clean water supply that too free of cost as it is a human right.

Each and every tax payer of this country deserves to have a avalability of clean water in their houses. Municipalities are appointed by the government in order to filter the river water and provide it to the common public after making it drinkable. Due to any scenario if anyone is not able to take an advantage of the same, they would try to access water from the other water bodies which can cause a serious harm to their health. For an instance, every year 5% of the people are dying by consuming conteminated water.

To continue with that, water is a ntural source on which everyone has an equal right however, it is government's responsibility to distribute it to each and every houses as they are recovering the distribution cost from the public only. However it is user's look-after as well to utilise water carefully without wasting it as human and animal's lives are dependent on it. For an example, water shortage is the second most concern for the world after the raising sea level issue.

All in all, everyone deserves to have a access of clean water regardless of any other factors as well as animals also, however it is user's reponsibility to utilise it carefully and protect it from being wasted.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the opening: you agree that households should receive clean water free of charge, and you return to this view in the conclusion. You give relevant reasons, including the health risks of unsafe water and the government’s role in distributing it, and you also recognise the need to avoid waste. This covers the task well. However, some points are asserted rather than explained: the claim that 5% of people die each year from contaminated water is not contextualised, and the link between taxes and free household supply could be developed more clearly. The discussion of animals and water shortages is also less directly connected to whether household water should be free. Explaining these points and supporting them more precisely would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The ideas generally progress from the right to clean water, to public provision and health, and then to responsible use. Linking phrases such as “To continue with that” and “All in all” help signal movement between sections. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Due to any scenario” does not clearly introduce the situation being discussed, while “For an instance” and “For an example” repeat the same linking function. The second body paragraph also combines government responsibility, user responsibility, animal life and water shortages without fully showing how each point supports the main argument. Use clearer transitions and organise each paragraph around one developed reason.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “human right,” “Municipalities,” “drinkable,” “distribution cost” and “water shortage.” These choices show an attempt to discuss public services and environmental concerns, but control is uneven, which sometimes makes the meaning less natural. Phrases such as “a basic human requirement,” “take an advantage,” and “user’s look-after” are awkward or imprecise in context. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “avalability,” “conteminated,” “ntural” and “reponsibility.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations rather than adding formal-sounding phrases. Proofreading spelling and choosing standard expressions for access, responsibility and safe water would make your argument clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “without which a life can not be imagined” and a conditional structure beginning “if anyone is not able to…”. The main ideas are usually understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. Articles and noun forms are problematic in phrases such as “a avalability,” “a access,” and “each and every houses.” There are also issues with sentence construction and punctuation: the opening sentence is long and awkwardly joined, and “To continue with that, water is…” would benefit from a clearer grammatical connection to the previous point. Work on articles, singular and plural agreement, and breaking long sentences into controlled clauses while continuing to practise complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.