Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Access to clean water is one of the most important basic human need. Some people believe that every household should receive a water supply completely free of charge. I agree with this view because clean water should be available to everyone, but unlimited free water for waste and financial problems.

First of all, clean water is helpfull for human health and daily life. people need water for drinking, coocking and washing. Poor families to pay struggle their waterbills, speacially to developing countries. If government provide a basic amount of clean water free of charge This could also reduce disease caused by unsafe drinking water. For example, families in rural areas may not have enough money to buy clean water, so government support could significantly improve their quality of life.

However, providing unlimited water completely free of charge could create some problems. If people do not have to pay anything, they may use more water then they eccually need. In addition, government have to spend a large amount of money on a water treatment, pipelines, maintenance and electricity. If all water were free, these cost would have to be pay through taxes or other or other public funds.

In my opinion, the best solution is to provide a basic amount of clean of water free of charge to every household. After this limit, people could be charged according to how much additional waer they use. This system could protect poor families while also use everything to use water responsibility.

In conclusion, clean water should be considered a basic human right. However, government should apply unlimited clean water free of cost, in poor families.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you support free access to essential water, while arguing that use beyond a basic allowance should be charged. This directly addresses the question and gives a relevant qualification. The health benefits, affordability for poorer households, and risk of waste provide appropriate reasons, with a rural-family example to illustrate the first point. However, some ideas are less fully developed than others. The discussion of government costs identifies treatment, pipelines and maintenance, but does not explain how a basic free allowance would be funded or why it would be manageable. The conclusion also conflicts with your proposal when it says the government should apply “unlimited clean water free of cost.” Make the final position consistent and develop the funding argument more clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs, a proposed solution and a conclusion. Signposting such as “First of all,” “However,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the main stages of the argument. The basic-allowance proposal also provides a logical link between the benefits of access and concerns about waste. At times, however, cohesion is weakened by unclear or awkward connections. The sentence beginning “If government provide…” runs into the next sentence without clear punctuation, and “while also use everything to use water responsibility” makes the final point difficult to follow. The conclusion’s claim about unlimited free water also disrupts the progression of your position. Use clearer sentence boundaries and ensure each paragraph’s final point supports the same argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “water treatment,” “pipelines,” “maintenance,” “unsafe drinking water,” and “public funds.” These terms help you discuss both access and the practical costs of supplying water. However, the range and control are limited by repeated general words such as “water,” “people,” and “government,” as well as noticeable spelling and word-choice errors: “helpfull,” “coocking,” “speacially,” “eccually,” and “waer.” Some phrases are also unnatural, including “waterbills” and “use water responsibility.” These errors do not prevent the main argument from being understood, but they reduce precision and can slow the reader. Check spelling carefully and learn common collocations, such as “struggle to pay water bills” and “use water responsibly.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “If people do not have to pay anything, they may use more water” and a passive construction in “these cost would have to be pay.” The conditional is clear, but some errors in agreement, articles, verb forms and sentence boundaries remain. For example, “Some people believe” is followed by “I agree,” but the opening phrase “one of the most important basic human need” lacks plural agreement. In “If government provide,” the subject and verb do not agree, while “would have to be pay” needs a past participle. The sentence beginning “If government provide…” also needs a full stop before “This could.” Review agreement and passive forms, and punctuate sentence boundaries carefully; these corrections would make your meaning more consistently clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.