Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Having access to clean water is a basic human right; therefore, it is argued that everyone should be provided with water free of charge. I do not completely agree with this view, as I believe that while everyone should have access to clean water, people should not necessarily receive it completely free of charge.

On the one hand, I agree with the view that it is every person's right to have access to clean water. There should be no discrimination when it comes to accesing this essential resource. For example, poor and needy people may not be able to afford clean drinking water, so they should atleast be provided with enough water to meet their requirements. This ensures that everyone maintains a healthy standard of living regardless of their financial situation.

On the other hand, I do not believe that providing water completely free of charge is necessary. This may lead to excessive use of water, particularly by industires and factories require large amounts of it to run manchines. For instance, if people do not have to pay anything for water, they may be less careful about how much they consume, which could contribute to water scarcity in the future. Therefore, a minimum fee should be charged for water so that people are encouraged to use this essential resource efficiently. This could help conserve water for future generations.

In conclusion, although having access to clean water is a basic human right, I dont agree that it should be provided completely free of charge. Charging a small fee could encourage people to use water more efficently and help conserve this resource for future generations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction and conclusion: you support access to clean water but oppose making all water entirely free. You address both sides and give relevant reasons, including affordability for poorer people and the risk of waste. The example of industrial use also helps explain your concern. This meets the task well, while the qualification in your position shows some nuance. However, the discussion is not equally developed: the point about poorer people is brief, and the argument that a fee would reduce consumption is asserted rather than supported with a specific example or explanation of how a basic supply could remain affordable. Develop these points further to make the response more fully convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs, and a conclusion that restates your position. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” makes the progression easy to follow. Within paragraphs, however, the links can feel somewhat mechanical, and some reasoning moves quickly from a claim to its consequence. For example, the discussion of industrial water use shifts to what “people” might do, without clearly distinguishing household and commercial consumption. Make these connections more explicit, and use referencing and transitions more flexibly so the argument flows through the ideas rather than relying mainly on set phrases.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “essential resource,” “water scarcity,” “financial situation,” and “conserve water,” which communicates the main ideas clearly. There are also some inaccurate word forms and spelling errors, such as “accesing,” “atleast,” “industires,” “manchines,” “dont,” and “efficently.” These do not prevent understanding, but they reduce the accuracy and polish of the writing. Some phrasing is also broad or repetitive, particularly repeated references to water being “free of charge.” Proofread carefully and choose more precise expressions for the distinction between a basic household supply and high-volume commercial use.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including the concession in “although having access to clean water is a basic human right” and the conditional structure “if people do not have to pay anything.” Most sentences are understandable, and errors rarely obscure your meaning. Some grammatical control is less secure in the sentence “particularly by industires and factories require large amounts of it,” where the clause structure is incomplete or incorrectly joined. The sentence beginning “For example” also contains a long sequence of ideas that would benefit from clearer sentence boundaries. Continue practising complex clauses and punctuation, while checking that each sentence has a complete, well-connected structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.