Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Water is a crucial element for the existence of life. It is widely believed that water should be accessible for everyone as it is a fundamental human right and its availability shoudl be free of cost. In my perspective, I believe, it is basic human right that water should be available and accessible to everyone.

First of all, the accessibility of water is a crucial point for people to live and flourish, thus making is a basic neccessity for the human population. As a result, the usage of water is highest among the other basic survival factors. For example, A report published by the UNICEF the water levels in some african regions is recorded below favourable levels which is a clear warning for severe drought in the coming years. This shows the importance and the problems that arise with reduced water level for humanity.

On the other hand, although the water is a crucial necessity, it should not be available for free and without any survailence by a regulatory authority. That is because, as mentioned earlier, it is a crucial survival need and the unrestricted use of such element can cause the drinkable water reserviours of nature to be reduced extensiveley which can result in severe situations like droughts and famines leading to death and even extinction of the human population in a region.

In conclusion, water is a basic need and should be availabe to every human being but not without any restricion or survailence. The use of this element should be not avaialbe for free so that people do not take advantage of it and use it unreservedly. Thus, various authoritative bodies should be established to keep an eye on the water levels and take necessary measures to educate people regarding the unnessary use of water and conservation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you support access to water for everyone but disagree that household water should be entirely free or unrestricted. You give relevant reasons, including the risk of overuse and the need for conservation, and the UNICEF example helps illustrate water scarcity. However, the response does not fully resolve the distinction between a basic right to clean water and whether a supply should be free of charge. The opening largely repeats the prompt, while the example about low water levels does not clearly show why charging households is necessary. Develop this link with a specific explanation, such as how a modest tariff could fund safe supply while ensuring a free basic allowance for those unable to pay.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting contrasting points, and a conclusion. The progression from water’s importance to concerns about unrestricted use is generally understandable, and phrases such as “First of all,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” signal the stages of the argument. At times, however, the links between ideas are mechanical or unclear. The UNICEF example is introduced as support for water’s importance, but its connection to the argument about charging for water is not made explicit. The conclusion also repeats the position rather than drawing the reasoning together. Use clearer links between each example and claim, and vary transitions so the argument develops more smoothly.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “fundamental human right,” “regulatory authority,” “drinkable water reservoirs,” and “conservation.” These choices show an attempt to discuss the issue beyond basic terms. However, several spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural collocations reduce control: “shoudl,” “neccessity,” “survailence,” and “availabe” are examples, while “water levels … recorded below favourable levels” is awkwardly phrased. Some repetition of “crucial” and “basic” also limits flexibility. Check spelling carefully and choose more natural combinations, such as “access to clean water,” “water reserves,” and “monitor water use.” This would make your vocabulary more precise and fluent without requiring unnecessarily complex wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including cause-and-effect clauses with “as a result” and a conditional structure in “if … can cause.” Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors affect accuracy. For example, “making is a basic necessity” has an incorrect verb form, and “the usage of water is highest among the other basic survival factors” has an unclear comparison structure. The sentence beginning “A report published by the UNICEF…” is also incomplete or poorly joined, making the relationship between the report and its finding difficult to follow. Review sentence boundaries, articles, and agreement, and proofread longer sentences by checking that each has a clear subject and main verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.