Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is considered that easily accessibility of clean water is a basic need of every individual. Hence, clean water should be free of cost for every house. This essay disagrees with the given notion because it increases wastage of water and financial burden on the government.

To commence by explaining why this trend impacts negatively on water resources. The first and foremost reason is that it enlarges wastage of water. In other words, if water is free of cost, then citizens will intend to misuse groundwater in several insufficient chores instead of drinking water. Generally, water is a basic need to do every work at home like bathing, washing clothes and utensils and many more. People may not use the recycling and filtering process of water because water is available everywhere. Thus, this leads to excessive use of water bodies. For example, an individual who pays for a single bottle of drinking water, then they know the importance of fresh water as compared to who has easy access of clean water.

Furthermore, the second reason why I disagree with this notion is that it raises the financial burden on the government by providing the water free of charge. To explain it, maintaining pipes, treating water and purification of water need high cost so that it will increase an encumbrance on the local authorities and the nation's funds which use in another important social problems of the society. For instance, 25% of the national fund are used in the management of water supply in a country.Therefore, it creates liabilities on the government so that water should not be free of cost.

In conclusion, although water is a basic human right of each person for social equality and healthy lifestyle, yet free water can create more issues like wastage of water and financial burden on the government. That's why, clean water should have the cost of buy, that individuals not only always know the importance of clean and fresh water but also it decreases the financial burden on nation's funds.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree because free provision could encourage waste and place costs on government. Both reasons are relevant, and you extend them with examples, including household uses of water and the costs of maintaining pipes and treating supplies. The conclusion also restates your view while acknowledging water’s importance as a human right. This addresses the task and gives the response a clear line of argument. However, some support is over-generalised or not fully convincing: the comparison with buying a bottle of water does not establish that household charges reduce waste, and the claim that 25% of national funds go to water management is presented without context. Explain the link between charges and conservation more directly, and develop the funding argument with a clearer, realistic example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your position, two body paragraphs present separate reasons, and the conclusion returns to the central argument. Sequencing phrases such as “Furthermore” and “In conclusion” help readers follow this progression, while examples are placed alongside the points they support. This gives the essay a logical flow. Some linking language is mechanical or awkward, however, particularly “To commence by explaining” and “To explain it,” and several sentences connect ideas without making their relationship precise. For example, the bottle-of-water comparison is introduced as evidence but its connection to household water charges is unclear. Use simpler, more natural transitions and make each example’s relevance explicit; this would make cohesion more flexible and less formulaic.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including terms such as “groundwater,” “recycling,” “purification,” “financial burden,” and “social equality.” These choices allow you to discuss both conservation and public costs, and some less common expressions show an effort to vary your language. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “easily accessibility,” “insufficient chores,” “enlarges wastage,” and “cost of buy.” Repetition of “free of cost” and “water” also limits flexibility. Choose more idiomatic phrases and check word forms: for example, “easy access,” “unnecessary household tasks,” “increases water waste,” and “should be charged for.” This would make your meaning more precise and fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional reasoning (“if water is free of cost, then citizens will…”) and concession in the conclusion (“although water is a basic human right…”). Most ideas remain understandable, and the essay’s sentence patterns are not limited to simple statements. Some grammatical errors nevertheless recur. Examples include “an individual who pays … then they know,” where the clause structure is incomplete, “25% of the national fund are,” which has an agreement problem, and “funds which use in another important social problems,” which lacks a correctly formed verb phrase and has number agreement issues. There are also punctuation and spacing slips, such as the missing space after “country.” Review clause construction, subject–verb agreement, and sentence boundaries to improve accuracy while retaining your complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.