Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is argued that clean water is a fundamental human right,and should be supplied to every household free of cost.However, I totally disagree with that view as it would leads towards wastage of water and a huge financial burden on government.

Addmittedly, access to clean water is essential for health and survival. In many developing countries like pakistan people are unable to pay the cost for clean water and are forced to drink contaiminated water which leads towards serious health problems like dysentry,hapatitis,and many other water-borne diseases.For that government should provide the water to such areas where poverty ratio is higher at affordable price ,so everyone can drink filtered water.

However, i believe making water completely free for every home is not a practical solution. Firstly, people are more likely to waste those things that are available for free.If there is no charge ,people will not have any motivation to safe it for future which may cause troubles in future.For instance, many cities of Pakistan are facing water scarcity because many people left the water taps running,overwater their gardens and washing their cars without limiting the water pressure ,all these factors collectively contribute to the water shortage.

Furthermore, government spent a handsome amount on making water clean by planting filtration plants,building dams and piplines.The whole process of water supply is very expensive if government will not charge for supplying water than the amount will be added into the taxes which is not a sustainable solution.

In conclusiom, Although clean water is human right it should not be free of cost,people must pay affordable price of it to prevent extra wastage.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction—“I totally disagree”—and remains consistent in the conclusion. You address the central issue by arguing that universal free provision could encourage waste and place a financial burden on government. The discussion of people in poorer areas who cannot afford clean water adds a relevant qualification, and the examples of running taps and watering gardens help support your point. To develop the response further, explain more precisely how affordable charges could protect access while discouraging waste, and expand the financial argument by showing how costs might be funded or distributed. Some claims, such as the link between free water and waste, are presented broadly rather than fully examined, so more explanation would make the support more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall progression: an opening position, a paragraph recognising the need for access, two paragraphs explaining your disagreement, and a concluding summary. Paragraphing is appropriate, and signposts such as “However,” “Firstly,” and “Furthermore” make the main stages easy to follow. The example about water use in Pakistani cities is placed logically after the point about waste. At times, however, connections between ideas are a little mechanical, and some sentences contain several points joined together, particularly the list of water-wasting activities. Use clearer sentence boundaries and occasional referencing such as “these practices” to link examples back to the claim. This would make the progression smoother while retaining the effective structure.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “fundamental human right,” “water scarcity,” “financial burden,” and “water-borne diseases.” These choices help communicate the argument, and you attempt more specific terms such as “filtration plants” and “water pressure.” However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, including “leads towards,” “safe it for future,” and “poverty ratio is higher.” Spelling errors such as “contaiminated,” “dysentry,” and “conclusiom” also reduce accuracy. These issues do not prevent the reader from understanding your main points, but careful proofreading and more natural phrasing would improve precision. Aim to learn topic vocabulary in complete collocations rather than as isolated words.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including a concession (“Although clean water is a human right…”) and conditional reasoning (“If there is no charge…”). The main argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors occur in both sentence construction and verb forms. For example, “it would leads” should use the base form after “would,” while “government spent” and “if government will not charge” do not express the intended tense and conditional accurately. There are also sentence-boundary and punctuation problems, especially where several clauses are joined with commas. Practise forming accurate conditionals and checking subject–verb patterns, then divide long sentences where each clause expresses a separate point.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.