Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often claimed that it is the basic human rights to have convenient availability of water. Hence, it is essential that residents must have water pipelines connected within their households. I firmly disagree with the statement that supply of water should be free of charge as it can be source of ecomomy development, substantially it require adequate budget to construct managable pipeline to reach each household.

Water could be large source for any prosperity of economy within the country. Individuals should charge as per their consumptions with the fair rate which everyone can normally afford. The large scale industries and factories may intake huge proportions of water for the daily production and manufacturing so it will not be fair to make free of charge. In this way, people will be more aware about the proper and efficient utilization of water, as if it made non-chargeable then numerous residents might take it for granted. Many developing countries consider water as the primary source of economic advancement. For example, construction of different dam, water resorvior which store enourmous water can be further utilized in supply of irrigation which will ultimately foster in further development.

Moreover, for the easy access and manageable supply of water to each individuals houses can be expensive as it will need for the construction of pipeline, proper implementation plan, man power, different advanced machinery tools. The cost can be vary from the location, sites, area coverage and many more. Therefore, implementing water supply to free can hamper to economy loss. As these water can further efficiently utilised in agriculture sectors, recreational sector where it can boost in domestic and international tourism industry.

In conclusion, supply of water should not be free as we can charge on the basis of it's usage, peeople will be more consious and it will save the water eventually further which can be used in other sectors which will foster in the develoopment of a country.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction and conclusion: you disagree with free household water, and you give relevant reasons concerning infrastructure costs, industrial use and conservation. The examples about factories and dams also help connect the argument to economic activity. This meets the task well overall. However, some points are less fully developed than others. For instance, the claim that charging for water will make people use it more carefully is plausible, but you do not explain how fair pricing could protect low-income households or ensure everyone still has access to this basic right. The discussion of dams and tourism is also only loosely connected to whether household water should be free. Develop these links and address the human-rights aspect more directly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present reasons, and a conclusion restates your position. Sequencing is generally easy to follow, and transitions such as “Moreover” and “In conclusion” signal the stages of the argument. Some connections, however, are mechanical or unclear. The first body paragraph moves from household charges to industrial consumption and then to dams and irrigation without fully explaining how each point supports the same claim. In the second paragraph, the shift from pipeline costs to agriculture and tourism is similarly abrupt. Clarify the relationship between each example and your main argument, and use referencing more precisely so that phrases such as “these water” have an unmistakable antecedent.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “economic advancement,” “irrigation,” “implementation plan” and “domestic and international tourism industry.” These choices show an effort to discuss infrastructure and wider economic effects. However, inaccurate word choice, collocation and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less clear. Examples include “source of ecomomy development,” “large proportions of water,” “water resorvior,” and “foster in further development.” Several expressions appear to be direct or awkward combinations rather than natural English. Aim for accurate, conventional collocations and check spelling carefully; a smaller set of well-controlled terms will communicate your ideas more effectively than ambitious but imprecise phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple statements and attempts at complex structures, including conditional reasoning (“if it made non-chargeable then…”) and clauses introduced by “as” and “which.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main argument is usually understandable. However, complex sentences are not consistently controlled, and errors in articles, agreement, verb forms and sentence construction recur. For example, “it is the basic human rights” has an article and number problem, while “it will need for the construction” uses an incorrect grammatical pattern. In “the cost can be vary,” the modal is followed by an incorrect verb form. Review these patterns and break up sentences when several ideas are being joined; this will improve accuracy without limiting your range.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.