Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There is an inevitable truth which discusses the accessibility to purified water should be free of cost.This essay firmly agrees with the context because water is considerably a fundamental right for human beings.I believe that,people should have access to purified water in order to be free from fatal diseases occurring from polluted water.

It is an imperative truth that,getting access to crystal water is considered as a foremost human right as well as other rights.Furthermore,every households should be provided with purified water supply opportunities at free of costs.Reasonably,if the water is not clean then the survival of human beings leave with a big question mark.There are many slum-dwellers whom are consuming polluted water from rivers,canals and ponds which are mostly being wasted by us.Consequently,consumption of polluted water on a daily basis is spreading a plenty of water-borne diseases such as diarrhoea,cholera and many other skin-diseases.If each households are not provided with purified water supply then these households will remain in the darkness and will be stripped of their human rights.

From my perspective,i agree to this context because i believe that,if we become successful in providing purified water access to each and every households then we can ensure one of the most significant fundamental rights of survival as a human being.For instance,if the slum-dwellers can have the access to clean water then they can cook their daily food with a healthy manner which will ensure their healthy lifestyle free from the fear of fatal diseases.Nevertheless,if accessibility to clean water is not ensured for every households then the slum-dwellers will tend to fall from the palm of this society.They will no longer be able to properly utilize the resources of this society. As a consequence they will feel useless and non-existent.Reasonably,we have to ensure this privilege for every population in order to give everyone their basic rights which they deserve.

In conclusion,i firmly agreed with this fact because it is crucial for us to address issues of this society keeping our own interests aside to feel the sense of belongingness.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the opening: you agree that households should receive clean water, and you maintain this view in the conclusion. You give relevant reasons, especially the risk of water-borne diseases, and illustrate them with examples such as slum-dwellers using polluted rivers and canals. This covers the task well. However, the argument focuses mainly on health and human rights; the claim that water should be free of charge is not explored in depth. For example, explain why charging for supply would be unfair or how free provision could be funded and managed. Some consequences, such as people feeling “useless and non-existent,” are asserted rather than clearly connected to access to water. Developing these points would make the response more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, with the main position carried through. Ideas generally progress from the health risks of polluted water to the benefits of providing clean water. You also use linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “Consequently” and “For instance.” At times, however, these devices feel repetitive or mechanical, and some links do not make the relationship between ideas clear. The second body paragraph, for example, moves from healthy cooking to social exclusion and then to a sense of belonging without fully explaining the connections. Some references, including “this context” and “these households,” are also vague. Use clearer topic sentences and make each supporting point follow directly from the previous one.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “fundamental right,” “polluted water,” “water-borne diseases” and “survival,” which helps communicate the central argument. There are also efforts to use less common expressions, but several choices or combinations are unnatural and sometimes make the meaning less precise. Examples include “crystal water,” “a plenty of water-borne diseases,” “fall from the palm of this society” and “feel the sense of belongingness.” Repetition of “purified water” and “households” also limits flexibility. Aim for accurate, natural collocations rather than ornate phrases, and distinguish between “clean,” “safe” and “purified” where appropriate. More precise vocabulary would make your ideas easier to follow and strengthen the academic tone.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “if the water is not clean” and clauses introduced by “because” and “which.” This shows some range, but control is inconsistent, and errors occur across sentence patterns. For example, “every households should be provided” has a number-agreement problem, while “the survival of human beings leave” has a subject–verb agreement error. The conditional sentence “if each households are not provided” also contains agreement errors. Articles, plurals and punctuation are often inaccurate, and several sentences run together without appropriate spacing after full stops. Practise checking one sentence at a time for subject–verb agreement, singular and plural forms, and sentence boundaries; this will make your complex ideas clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.