Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

Some people believe that one of the basic human rights is the accessibility to clean water. And for this reason, every household should be provided clean water supply free of cost. In this essay, I shall discuss my disagreement on this statement because clean water is a limited resource which requires a lot of efforts to collect and distribute, and making it free of cost will lead to wastage of it indiscriminately.

Clean water should not be provided free of cost as its collection process is complicated and costly. Even though the Earth's 3/4th surface is covered by water, sea water or salt water is not suitable for drinking, or household works. Groundwater, which is the major source of clean water used for daily life, require advanced technologies and machineries for collection and distribution. The government allocates a large amount of budget for installing and maintaining such machineries. A lot of employment opportunities are also generated through this process. So, providing it free of cost will take a toll on the country's economy.

Another reason why clean water should not be free of cost is because people have a tendency to take such service for granted. As a result, they will start wasting it without thinking about the consequences. For example, if clean water is provided for free of cost, people won't care about turning their taps off after usage. At this rate, the quantity of clean water wasted each year will skyrocket. Furthermore, if this trend continues, the groundwater level will start depleting. This scenario can lead to a global water crisis. So, it is absolutely necessary to charge people for access to clean water so that they will think twice before wasting it.

In conclusion, even if it is considered as a basic human rights by some people, I don't think people should have the previlage of free water access. Because it can lead to an even greater crisis.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree because water collection and distribution are costly and free provision could encourage waste. Both reasons are relevant and are extended with explanations, including the link between waste and falling groundwater levels. This meets the task well. However, the response treats “free of charge” as meaning that all water use would be unlimited and uncharged. It does not consider alternatives such as guaranteeing a basic household supply while charging for higher consumption, nor does it fully address how a human right might be protected. The economic point is also somewhat general: explaining who should bear the costs, or giving a specific example, would make the support more convincing and less reliant on broad claims.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall progression: an introduction states your position, two body paragraphs develop separate reasons, and the conclusion restates your view. Linking phrases such as “Another reason,” “As a result,” and “Furthermore” help readers follow the argument, while the example about leaving taps running supports the second point. To make the organisation more flexible and polished, reduce repeated wording such as “free of cost” and “clean water,” and use more precise referencing where possible. The conclusion is very brief and introduces “privilege” without developing the distinction between a basic supply and unlimited free use. A fuller final paragraph could synthesise the two reasons and clarify the scope of your disagreement.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use a suitable range of topic vocabulary, including “groundwater,” “distribution,” “depleting,” and “global water crisis,” and the meaning remains clear throughout. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “take a toll on the country's economy.” However, several choices are awkward or imprecise: “accessibility to clean water” is less natural than “access to clean water,” and “household works” does not clearly express domestic uses. “Free of cost” is repeated often, and “previlage” is misspelled; “privilege” is also not quite the right term for access to a basic service. Greater control of collocations and more varied, precise wording would strengthen the vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex structures, including a relative clause in “Groundwater, which is the major source…” and conditional sentences such as “if this trend continues.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “Groundwater … require” needs subject–verb agreement (“requires”), and “one of the basic human rights is the accessibility” has an awkward grammatical construction. The opening “And for this reason” is a sentence fragment in formal writing, while “Because it can lead…” is also an incomplete sentence after the conclusion’s preceding statement. Review agreement, sentence boundaries, and the construction of introductory clauses. More consistently accurate complex sentences would improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.