Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is undineable that fresh water's shortage is creating serious problems in the society. while some people believe that introduction of charge on water can be helpful to reduce its wastage, critics argued that it should be free for human beings around the world because of basic necessity and poor people cannot afford clean water cost. I firmly supports later view, which will be discussed in this essay.

Those who argued that clean water should be charged, claiming it will be reduce water wastage. Because people often do not value things that they can easily have, and they are wasting unnecessarily huge amount of fresh drinkable water. For example, most of the individuals wash their clothes and vehicles with clean water, which is provided them to drink.

However, I largely believe having drinkable fresh water is a basic human rights as it fulfills primary needs of people. Each and every indivduals on this planet cannot survive without water, even animals are too, and a large number of individuals are struggling with water crisis, which contains high amount of sendiments and bacteria, resulting in health issues among people. In addition, those who lacks privilege of rich status, such people are unable to afford charge to drink clean water. This is because poor people earning the least amount of money, which they may hardly can save for betterment of their lives as high inflation around the world causing huge rise in expenses. As a result, poor people could not pay such price for clean water.

T

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you support free access to clean water, and you acknowledge the opposing view that charging could reduce waste. The response also gives relevant reasons, including water’s necessity for survival and the difficulty poorer households would face paying for it. These points address the question, but they are not developed equally. The example of washing clothes and vehicles illustrates waste, yet the essay does not explain how charging would reduce it or address whether free household supply could be limited to essential use. The argument about affordability is more developed, though it relies on broad claims about poverty and inflation. Extend the ideas with a specific example and explain how they support your position more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting the opposing argument, and a paragraph explaining your own view. Linking expressions such as “However,” “In addition,” and “As a result” help show relationships between ideas. However, progression is not consistently smooth. The final paragraph combines survival, water contamination, health effects, poverty, and inflation in a long chain, so the central affordability argument becomes harder to follow. The opening also moves quickly from water scarcity to charging and then to the essay’s position. Organise each paragraph around one main point, use clearer sentence boundaries, and make references such as “such people” more precise to improve cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “water wastage,” “water crisis,” “bacteria,” “health issues,” and “inflation.” These choices make the subject clear, and you attempt more formal expressions such as “basic human rights” and “betterment of their lives.” However, several inaccurate word choices, collocations, and spelling errors reduce precision: “undineable” appears to mean “undeniable,” “sendiments” should be “sediments,” and “rich status” is not a natural way to describe wealth. Phrases such as “fresh drinkable water” and “charge to drink clean water” are also awkward or repetitive. Build accuracy by learning common collocations for water access, affordability, and household consumption, and proofread spelling.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “Because,” “which,” and “as.” This shows an effort to explain causes and consequences, but control is inconsistent, and errors sometimes make sentences difficult to follow. Examples include “I firmly supports” (subject–verb agreement), “it will be reduce” (verb form), and “Each and every indivduals … cannot survive” (number agreement). The sentence beginning “Those who argued …” is a fragment, while “poor people earning the least amount of money” lacks a finite verb. Capitalisation after full stops is also inconsistent. Practise checking each sentence for a complete main clause, correct subject–verb agreement, and accurate verb forms; then use complex clauses in shorter, controlled sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.