Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Water pure enough to drink is a basic human right and should be available at every home without costing anything. I do agree that it should be free, as it is necessary to sustain life. Water is more important than food for survival.

Water is needed for multiple purposes in households. It can be used to wash clothes, to take a bath, or to drink. In Pakistan, nearly 60% of people do not have access to clean water. People who drink dirty water often get sick due to it. Impure water spreads diseases like hepatitis and fever. People who do have access to fresh water do so because they buy it from filters, whereas it should be the government's responsibility to provide clean water to every house free of cost. I agree because not everyone can avail of clean water from filters, while it is necessary for people.

The international governments should have agreed on the fact that water is a necessity for every person. People cannot fare well without water, as water is necessary to quench their thirst. However, when it was about to become a basic human right, some countries opposed it. For that reason, water is not considered a basic human necessity. In African countries, people are going through severe dehydration, as there is very little water. The international governments could've agreed and provided clean water to these people free of cost to help them. Yet, a basic human right was denied to people. Water is important to sustain life. I disagree with the decision of the United Nations, which denied water as a basic necessity.

To sum up, water is a necessity for survival and a human right. Everyone deserves to have clean water available at their house without costing them anything. The United Nations should have made water a basic necessity.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that clean water should be free, and you support this with points about health, household needs and unequal access in Pakistan. These are relevant reasons, and the examples of illness and people buying filtered water help explain the issue. However, some ideas are less fully developed than others. The discussion of international governments and the United Nations shifts towards whether water has been formally recognised as a right, rather than explaining how free household supply could be provided or funded. The claim that some countries opposed this right is also not supported with a specific example. Develop the practical implications of your position and explain each example more precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and the main position is generally easy to follow. Linking phrases such as “For that reason,” “However” and “To sum up” help signal relationships between ideas. However, progression is uneven: the second body paragraph moves from international recognition to dehydration in Africa and then back to the United Nations, without a clear sequence connecting these points. Repetition of “Water is important to sustain life” and repeated statements that water should be free also limit development. Use each paragraph to build one main argument, and make references such as “it” and “these people” more specific where needed.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use adequate vocabulary to discuss access, health and rights, including “dehydration,” “impure water,” “necessity” and “responsibility.” These choices make the central message clear, and you attempt some topic-specific language. However, several expressions are repetitive or imprecise, such as “free of cost,” “fresh water” when you mean safe drinking water, and “fare well without water.” Some phrases also sound unnatural, including “international governments” and “when it was about to become a basic human right.” Greater precision and more natural collocations would strengthen the argument. Choose terms consistently—for example, distinguish clean drinking water from water for other household uses—and avoid repeating the same wording when a suitable alternative is available.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, and most sentences communicate their meaning clearly. For example, “People who drink dirty water often get sick due to it” uses a relative clause, while “I agree because not everyone can avail of clean water from filters” links a reason to your position. Some grammatical and punctuation issues remain. In “The international governments should have agreed on the fact,” the past modal form does not fit the general argument; “should agree” would be more appropriate. “When it was about to become a basic human right” also has an unclear reference for “it.” Review tense choices and pronoun references, and use commas carefully around introductory clauses. These refinements would make your varied sentences more controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.