Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

People of nation has right to have pure water as a basic requirement for sustaining in the world and so every house should be provided with water without costing anything. While every human has right to get water as free for basic necessity, I firmly disagree, as getting a free water supply might not help government to develop water availability.

To begin with, the most compelling factor is that getting water without charging anything would not provide government enough funds for betterment for water facilities. This may negatively affect as the government could not use advance technologies for enhancing the quality of water and thus people may not able to get pure form of water. Subsequently, the unclean water provided by government may damage individuals health by giving birth to chronic disease which happens by using impure water.For example, recently a society in gujarat has experienced a massive disaster as the government didn't focus on the water quality and so it lead to several disease to members of society.

In addition, the another point is that due to less funding the government could not able to deliver the excess amount of water to different regions of the nation. This is because of less utilities available to transport the water to rural areas or any isolated areas. Moreover, the people may not avail the amount of water needed in their daily life and might get disappointed which led to further controversies. For instance, the government was lacking to provide enough water in the rural areas as the costing to build pipelines was expensive and the region was isolated. Thus it created feeling of dissatisfaction among people living in that area.

To conclude, water is a basic necessity for human and should be provided in excess amount but not free as it may cost human by having impure water which may lead to chronic disease and less availability in rural areas or isolated areas.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree with making household water free, while recognising that access to water is a basic right. Both body paragraphs give relevant reasons—reduced funding could affect water treatment, and limited resources could restrict supply to rural areas—and the examples help illustrate these concerns. This addresses the task well. However, some points are asserted more than explained: for instance, the link between charging for water and the government’s ability to fund facilities would be stronger with a brief explanation of how charges support investment, or a qualification for households unable to pay. The conclusion repeats the main concerns but does not add a final implication. More balanced development and precise support would make the argument more fully convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, two reason-based body paragraphs and a conclusion. The progression from water quality to distribution is logical, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “In addition” and “To conclude” make the stages easy to follow. Some cohesion is nevertheless mechanical: both body paragraphs rely on a similar sequence of claim, explanation and “For example,” while “This” and “Thus” sometimes refer to broad preceding ideas rather than one precise point. The second paragraph also moves from funding to transport infrastructure and then public dissatisfaction without fully connecting each step. Use a wider range of linking methods and make references explicit, so the argument flows through the reasoning rather than depending mainly on transition phrases.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “water facilities,” “quality of water,” “rural areas” and “isolated areas,” and the reader can generally understand your argument. There are also attempts at more formal expressions, such as “compelling factor” and “chronic disease.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive: “betterment for water facilities,” “get water as free,” “excess amount of water” and “led to further controversies” do not express the intended ideas naturally. Repeated use of “water,” “government” and “areas” also limits flexibility. Build a bank of accurate topic collocations—for example, “water-treatment infrastructure” and “reliable supply”—and check whether each phrase sounds natural in context. These improvements would make your meaning more precise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple and complex sentences, including clauses with “as,” “which” and “because,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, errors occur across many sentence patterns and sometimes make the reader pause. Examples include “People of nation has right,” “the government could not use advance technologies,” and “the government could not able to deliver,” where agreement, articles or verb construction are faulty. There are also problems with plurals and sentence boundaries, as in “several disease” and “impure water.For example.” Practise building accurate basic clauses first, then add subordinate clauses while checking subject–verb agreement, articles and verb forms. Careful proofreading for punctuation and sentence boundaries would also improve clarity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.