Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

water is a basic necessarity for survival . A signficant number of people have accessible to water supply that is given free of charge. I partially agree with this statement because access to clean water is human right and it helps to protect from waterborne diseases and also helps in improve standard of living and it also creates concerns for authorities.

To begin with , clean water enables to protect from unwanted diseases. For explain, water is a thing that use in every activties such as cleaning utensiles, cooking , and so on . If people utilise low quality water for preparing meals and bathing, it will cause diseases related to body . Government ought to provide water supply without any charges so, individuals do not get affect from ailments . Thus, they can drink and eat meal safely . Additionally, people who are economically disadvantaged and have not afford charges of water . Government should provide free water supply so, they can improve their quality of life and reduce inequality between affluent and impoverised .Hence, it leads to protect public health and strenghten standard of living .

However, water supply without pay causes severe challenges to government and future generations. For elaborate, Government should require a fixed amount for repair and maintainence of water supply . If people do not pay fair for water supply , it will create Burden for government . without society , government not able to colllect huge amount for any consequences. Conversly, While people getting water supply without cost, they will forget the value of water . They start to use water excessively , which can create severe threat for upcoming generation. Consequently, it causes to increase authority burden and water shortage .

In conclusion, Although free of water supply helps to improve standard of living of poor people, it also creates difficulties to authority and generation. Provide water supply without charges help to protect from waterborne diseases . However , These challenges can be mitigated by charging reasonable amount from people .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you partially agree, supporting free access for health and fairness while recognising costs and waste. You address both sides and return to your view in the conclusion, so the response covers the task. The health argument is supported with examples such as using water for cooking and cleaning, and you explain why poorer households may benefit. However, the case for charging is less fully developed: the need to fund repairs and the risk of excessive use are asserted, but specific explanation or an example would make them more convincing. The conclusion also introduces reasonable charges without clearly explaining how this would preserve access as a basic right. Develop that balance more precisely to strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for benefits and drawbacks, and a conclusion. The progression from health and affordability to government costs and conservation is generally logical, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. At times, though, linking is mechanical or the relationship between ideas is unclear. For example, “without society, government not able to collect huge amount” does not clearly explain the connection between payment and repair costs. Several sentences also join multiple points with repeated “and” or “so,” making the paragraph harder to navigate. Use clearer sentence boundaries and refer back explicitly to the relevant idea when explaining consequences.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “waterborne diseases,” “economically disadvantaged,” “inequality,” and “water shortage.” These choices show an effort to express more than basic ideas. However, word choice, spelling, and collocation errors are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning difficult to interpret. Examples include “a basic necessarity,” “have accessible to water supply,” “impoverised,” and “increase authority burden.” Some expressions appear to be direct translations rather than natural English, such as “For elaborate” and “a thing that use in every activities.” Build accuracy by learning common topic collocations and checking word forms and spelling. Prefer precise, natural phrases such as “access to a water supply,” “fund maintenance,” and “place a burden on the authorities.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including conditional and contrast structures: “If people utilise low quality water…” and “Although free of water supply helps…”. This gives the essay some structural variety. However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors in verb forms, articles, agreement, and sentence construction recur. For instance, “Government ought to provide water supply” lacks an article, while “they can improve their quality of life and reduce inequality” follows an unclear subject reference. “If people do not pay fair for water supply” also has an incomplete grammatical pattern. These problems sometimes make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. Practise building accurate clauses with clear subjects and verbs, and check articles and agreement before adding further complexity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.