Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

Among the other basic human necessities, access to pure water stands out as one of the most vital right that all humans should enjoy. Thus in my opinion adequate steps should be taken to ensure a free supply of clean water is provided to every home.

The primary reason behind my stance involves the prevention of diseases and loss of lives caused by the consumption of unclean water. For instance, many citizens living in slums with no access to clean water, rely on drinking tap water directly and as a consequence bear the risk of catching illnesses like typhoid. Being poverty stricken these people cannot afford proper treatment and thus are more like to not survive. If they had the option of getting clean water free of cost then these portion of the general populace would not have had to rely on unclean and impure water to sustain themselves.

Additionally, it should be a given that the government of a country ensures that each and every one of its citizens are not deprived of any of their fundamental rights as a human being. Putting a price on clean water violates this term and in turn will allow dissatisfaction to foster in the citizens against their government. Growing unhappiness amongst the citizens of a nation is extremenly dangerous for it may result in protests which will create instability and chaos within the state. For example there are already numerous recorded cases where deprivation of basic human rights like freedom of speech spiralled into a revolution that consumed the nation. Thus for a country to prosper it is of paramount importance that they try to ensure free clean water is being supplied to each and every citizen.

In conclusion, as a basic human right there is no question that clean water be provided to all without any charge. If the people are happy then the state in turn will be benefited in one way or another.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction—“a free supply of clean water” should be provided to every home—and it remains consistent in the conclusion. You address the question with two relevant reasons: protecting health, especially for people in slums, and the government’s responsibility to uphold basic rights. The typhoid example helps explain the first point, while the discussion of public dissatisfaction extends the second. This meets the task well, with ideas generally extended and supported. To strengthen the response further, develop the link between charging for water and political instability more carefully: the comparison with revolutions over freedom of speech is broad and does not directly show that water charges would have the same effect. A more specific example or explanation would make this argument more convincing and precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear four-paragraph structure, and its progression is easy to follow: you state your view, present a health-based reason, add a government-responsibility argument, and conclude. Linking phrases such as “For instance,” “Additionally,” and “In conclusion” help signal the stages of the argument. Within paragraphs, you usually explain the point after introducing it, so the reader can follow the reasoning. Some connections are less smooth, however. The shift from water charges to revolutions over freedom of speech is abrupt, and the repeated references to “each and every” citizen and “free clean water” make parts of the argument feel repetitive. Use more precise links between claims and examples, and vary references to the central idea to make cohesion more natural.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use a reasonably broad range of vocabulary for the topic, including “fundamental rights,” “deprivation,” “instability,” and “paramount importance.” These choices help you discuss both public health and government responsibility, and the meaning remains clear throughout. There are also some inaccurate or unnatural choices that keep the vocabulary from being consistently precise: “most vital right” needs a plural form, “more like to not survive” is an incorrect expression, and “these portion” has a word-form and agreement problem. “Pure water” and “clean water” are understandable, but the latter is more natural and consistent for this topic. Check spelling as well: “extremenly” should be “extremely.” Aim for accurate collocations and forms when using less common vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional and cause-and-effect sentences: “If they had the option…” and “For example, there are already…” This gives the response some variety, and most sentences communicate the intended meaning. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with agreement and sentence construction. For example, “one of the most vital right” should be “one of the most vital rights,” and “each and every one of its citizens are” should be “is.” The opening of the second body paragraph, “Additionally, it should be a given that…,” is also awkwardly constructed. Review subject–verb agreement, plural forms, and sentence boundaries; more consistent accuracy across these structures would make the argument easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.