Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The availability of clean water is a basic human necessity and a universal right. For this reason, it is argued that every household should have access to a free water supply. If questioned, I strongly agree with this viewpoint because water is the most essential component of human life, and no individual can claim ownership of it on the basis of its discovery.

Earth is divided into three components, 97% of sea water, 2% of clean water in form of lakes, rivers or glaciers and remaining consists of land. People cannot claim or register patent if they find breakthrough of other sources of fresh water. Clean water is a basic human right and everyone in the world, no matter if your background is rich or poor, should have authority to have drinkable water without paying any value.

Water is the most vital component of any phase of human life. Water is not only used for drinkable purpose, but also used in other aspects like cooking food. For instance, to make any kind of dish like tea or food item, water is extremely used. Our human body is also consists of 70% of water and it needs water to stay hydrated and if executives start charging money then poor people will have crisis in their respective homes becaue they will face scarcity of food and their body will start dehydrating.

However, some people counter claim that sources of clean water is limited and government is trying numerous technology to convert sea water into fresh water so nation can claim money on that water.

To sum up, there is no law in any nation to charge water and clean water is the necessity for everyone no matter how countries are trying to get clean water, i strongly agree that every home should have a water supply free of charge.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you strongly support free household water, and the conclusion restates this view. You give relevant reasons, including water’s importance for drinking and cooking and the risk that charges could harm poorer households. However, these points are not developed equally: the discussion of cooking is brief, while the claim that there is “no law in any nation to charge water” is broad and unsupported. The paragraph about water sources also shifts towards ownership and desalination without clearly explaining how this supports free provision. To strengthen the response, explain how governments could fund or manage a free basic supply, and develop the counterargument before showing why your position remains stronger.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure, moving from your position to supporting points, a counterargument and a conclusion. Paragraphing generally helps the reader follow this sequence, and transitions such as “For instance,” “However,” and “To sum up” signal relationships between ideas. Some connections are less clear or feel mechanical, though. The second paragraph’s statistics about sea water, fresh water and land do not lead clearly to the claim about patents, and the counterargument is introduced but not answered. There is also repetition of the idea that water is essential. Improve progression by giving each paragraph one main purpose and explicitly linking evidence to your argument; use references such as “this concern” only when their meaning is unmistakable.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “universal right,” “fresh water,” “scarcity,” and “dehydrating,” which helps communicate the central issue. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “counter claim” and “component.” However, several choices or combinations are unnatural or imprecise, including “authority to have drinkable water,” “without paying any value,” and “used for drinkable purpose.” “Our human body” and “executives” also do not express the intended meanings naturally. Spelling errors such as “becaue” further reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, conventional collocations and check word forms and spelling; this will make your argument sound more fluent and appropriately academic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional clause in “if executives start charging money” and a relative clause in “which is…”. The main ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity and control. For example, “Our human body is also consists” combines incompatible verb forms; “sources of clean water is limited” has a subject–verb agreement error; and “2% of clean water in form of lakes” is missing articles and a preposition. The long sentence beginning “Our human body…” also joins several ideas without clear punctuation. Practise accurate agreement, articles and verb patterns, and divide long sentences so each relationship between ideas is clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.