Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Providing free water supply that is drinkable to every home can be a debated topic, but what isn't debateable is the basic human right to access clean, drinkable water. This essay will outline exactly why it is important to exercise the right of access to clean water in every home and how governing bodies should play their role in it.

Clean water isn't just about that we have a right to it, but it is important to understand they reason behind it. Providing clean drinkable water not only helps people quench their thirst, but plays a significant role in ensuring that any of its drinkers do not experience any water-borne diseases like typhoid, and to stop such diseases form spreading. Making it free also ensure that people do not get charged any extra money to access their basic human right and also makes sure that the people drinking it, do not get any additional financial burden added. Many countries in Europe actually have this facility and to people watching from outside in, this feels like an alien concept to see people drinking water directly from their tap.

Furthermore, in places like Africa, where clean water sources are scarce, people have to walk long distances just to get to the water source, increasing their exersion and also making it difficult for them to exercise their basic human right. Now I understand that where the water table is low and it is hard to find sources of water, it becomes difficult to supply lines to directly to the houses, it should at least be ensured at there is a source every 100 meters apart. This is exactly where the governing bodies should play their part, and use the tax money collected to source drinkable water.

In conclusion, I think that people should get the access to clean water directly in their homes as it is a basic human right. Furthermore, in places where it is hard to source water, it should be ensured that a clean water is available every 100m and the governing bodies should play their due part in it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you support access to clean water as a basic right and argue that governments should help provide it. You address both household supply and places where water is scarce, using relevant points about water-borne illness, financial burden and the distance people may need to walk. However, these parts are not developed equally. The discussion of free household water focuses mainly on its benefits, without considering how the supply could be funded or whether free access should mean unlimited use. The suggestion of a water source every 100 metres is also specific but not explained or supported. Develop these points with a reasoned example and clarify how your proposal would work.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The progression from the health and financial benefits of free water to the challenges of scarcity is logical, and signposts such as “Furthermore” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. Some connections are less smooth or precise, however. The opening promises to explain the role of governing bodies, but that role is only briefly addressed in the second body paragraph. The shift from household supply to a source every 100 metres could also be signposted as a practical alternative for areas where direct connections are not feasible. Use clearer links between claims and examples, and avoid repeating the conclusion’s main points without adding a final implication.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “water-borne diseases,” “water table,” “scarce” and “financial burden,” which helps communicate the main ideas. There are also attempts at more descriptive phrasing, such as “an alien concept.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or informal: “drinkable water” is repeated where “safe drinking water” would sound more natural, and “exercise their basic human right” is not the usual expression. Spelling errors such as “debateable,” “form” for “from,” and “exersion” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural collocations and proofread spelling; this would make the vocabulary more controlled and appropriate to an academic essay.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including clauses with “where” and “as,” and most of the argument remains understandable. Some grammatical errors nevertheless occur in both sentence construction and agreement. For example, “Clean water isn't just about that we have a right to it” has an awkward clause structure, while “Making it free also ensure” needs subject–verb agreement. In “it should at least be ensured at there is a source,” the clause is incorrectly formed, and “a clean water” uses an unnecessary article with an uncountable noun. Review clause patterns, agreement, and articles, then check punctuation in longer sentences. More accurate control of these structures would strengthen the essay.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.