Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The access to pure water is a normal human right. Therefore every individual should have a water supply that is gave free of cost. I am agree of this statement.

To commence with, the clean water is crucial for every persone couse of there health safety if people drink a filty water so its not a good for there body. They are cuose by lots of concerns abot disease. To elaborate it, if people drinking a unpurify water so its harm human organs badly becouse are body need almose 70% of water in a day. For example, one study shows that uncleare water is poison for a human and also for animals its gave a risk to organs like kidny or lungs becouse these body part concume moat of the water acording to the biology. Thus, every human being need a clean and hygin water even water provide free of charge to everybody. becouse this is a right of people everywhere.

Furthermore, if we not drink a clean water so its also effect are hormonce this is not good for are upcoming generations the derity water gives us lots of sickness or harm are parts so we did not give birth to a healthy generations. In the other words, we almost used water everywhere in are dealy lives in cooking, bath or drinks through lots of ways. To explicate it, water is uesable in every sigle thing so it will be free of cost. Hance, i am agree with this.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear in the opening and conclusion: you agree that clean water should be free. You give relevant reasons, including health risks from contaminated water and water’s role in daily activities. However, the discussion is only partly developed. The health paragraph repeats the danger of dirty water, while claims about hormones and future generations are unclear and not explained. The example of a study is vague, with no detail showing how it supports your argument. The response also focuses mainly on why clean water matters, rather than explaining why it should be provided free of charge or addressing how this could work. Develop distinct reasons and support each with a clear, relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has an identifiable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a concluding statement. Linking expressions such as “To commence with,” “Furthermore,” and “Thus” help signal stages in the argument. However, progression within paragraphs is often difficult to follow because ideas are repeated or connected unclearly. For example, the first body paragraph moves from health risks to a study, then to the claim that water should be free without explaining the link. Phrases such as “In the other words” and “To explicate it” do not always introduce a clear next step, and “this” in the final paragraph has an uncertain reference. Organise each paragraph around one reason and use simpler, more precise links between claim, explanation and example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “human right,” “disease,” “organs,” “clean water” and “generations,” so the reader can identify the subject and main concerns. However, the range is limited and many word-choice, collocation and spelling errors make parts of the argument difficult to understand. Examples include “filty,” “unpurify water,” “hygin water,” and “water is uesable in every sigle thing.” Some expressions are also unnatural, such as “free of cost” and “a normal human right.” Aim for accurate, natural combinations such as “safe drinking water,” “contaminated water” and “provided free of charge.” Check spelling and word forms carefully, and avoid using unfamiliar terms unless you are sure of their meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences with reasons, using forms such as “if people drink…” and “because…”. However, the range is limited, and attempts to build complex sentences are often faulty, so the reader has to work to interpret several points. For example, “I am agree” has an incorrect verb form, while “if we not drink a clean water so its also effect are hormonce” contains problems with negation, clause structure and agreement. Articles and sentence boundaries are also inconsistent, as in “the clean water” and the lowercase “because” after a full stop. Practise forming clear conditional sentences and checking subject–verb agreement, verb forms, articles and punctuation. Short, accurate sentences would make your reasoning easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.