Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-24
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Access to clean water is a basic human right but it does not mean it should be totally free. I completely disagree that every home should get fre water.
Firstly, the water is an essential need of everyone without water people cannot survive. Evey household need clean water. For example, in some villages in pakistan there is no clean water to drink and people hve to drink dirty water and it causes many diseases. Moreover, the government should have responsiblity to ensure and complete access to the water of everyone because this is the basic human right.
On the other hand, the water supply is completely not free because it creates mnay problems for everyone.At first the government should filteration the pipes, pay to workers. However if the water is free the people will waste a a lot they open the tap and do not close as they wash their cars daily. For instance, when people pay for someting they use it carefully. The govrnment should provide a limited amount watr to everone for free or at a low price or basi needs such as drinking and cooking. But if some peoplr use water for gae=rdening, for swiming pools they should pay for it, In this way the poor people get their basic right and water is not wasted.
In conclusion, while clean water is human right, and providing unlimited free water to everyhome is lead to wastage. A limited free supplu with
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You take a clear position against making all household water free, and you give relevant reasons: water treatment and workers cost money, while unlimited free use could encourage waste. The examples of unsafe water in Pakistani villages and people leaving taps open help illustrate the issue. However, the response only partly develops the task: the distinction between a free basic allowance and paid extra use is introduced late and would benefit from fuller explanation and support. The conclusion is unfinished, ending with “A limited free supplu with,” so it does not clearly complete your argument. The response is also 16 words below the 250-word minimum; the nine words copied from the prompt are not counted. Develop the proposed policy and finish the conclusion.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “On the other hand” and “In conclusion” show the intended progression. The main ideas are generally relevant and can be followed. However, connections between points are sometimes abrupt: the first paragraph moves from water as essential to government responsibility without explaining the link, while the second combines treatment costs, waste and a proposed pricing system in a crowded sequence. Some transitions are mechanical, and punctuation spacing makes boundaries harder to see, as in “everyone.At first.” The unfinished final sentence also disrupts the overall progression. Group each paragraph around one main point and use clearer links between the reason, example and conclusion.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the central argument, including “basic human right,” “water supply,” “filteration” and “waste.” The contrast between essential household use and optional uses such as car washing or swimming pools is also relevant. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less clear, including “fre water,” “mnay,” “someting” and “watr.” Some expressions are awkward or imprecise, such as “complete access to the water of everyone” and “the water supply is completely not free.” Aim for accurate collocations and forms, for example “ensure access to clean water for everyone” and “water supply is not cost-free.” Proofreading spelling and choosing more precise topic vocabulary would strengthen this criterion.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional idea in “if the water is free the people will waste a a lot” and a contrast introduced by “while.” These attempts show some range, but control is inconsistent, and errors frequently affect readability. For example, “without water people cannot survive” needs clearer sentence punctuation, and “Evey household need” has a subject–verb agreement error. The construction “providing unlimited free water to everyhome is lead to wastage” has an incorrect verb pattern, while “the government should have responsiblity” lacks the appropriate article and form. Several sentences run together or have incomplete punctuation. Practise accurate agreement, articles and verb patterns, and check that each sentence has a complete, correctly punctuated structure.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.