Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-25
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
Access to clean water is one of the basic human right. I strongly agree that everyone should have access to clean water because water is most essential for our survival.
Water is life. Human body is made up of 70% water. It helps regulate our bodily fluids and hormones. Our cells would die if there isn't enough water in our body. Again water is required for the survival of plants. Plants make food with the help of water and sunlight. Then we also eat plants for nutrients. Without access to water plants would die consequently our food source would perish. So, water is crucial for our survival.
Clean water is a basic human right for all. In this contemporary society where every dealing include individual's profit, we have neglected many people of clean water. Companies bill water more than necessary. Also in some places of the country water supply gets cut off for a few hours everyday. Water contminated diseases can't also be neglected. In many countires, such as africa, syria people are suffering from many water contiminated diseases. Jaundice, arsenosis, chloera and many other diseases are spreading due to lack of clean water. People living in villages ofter get black foot disease that occurs when arsenic gets mixed with drinking water. Another example is when an entire civilization in rome perished at the hands of an disease that spread through lead in water. Due to lack of clean water pregnant women also suffer from birth complication which may result in the death of mother or child.
In my opinion, clean water should be made available to homes free of cost. Many poor people in our society cannot pay the water bills. Some can't even buy purifiers for water. If access to clean water is made free of charge then many people can live healthier. We can also prevent viral diseases like chloera, arsenic contaminated diseases from spreading.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0
Your position is clear from the opening: you strongly agree that clean water should be available to everyone, and the conclusion returns to the proposal that it be free. You support this view with relevant points about human health, food production, poverty, and waterborne illness. The examples of contaminated water and its effects help extend the argument. However, the response sometimes makes broad claims without enough explanation or qualification, such as the statement that a civilization in Rome perished because of lead in water. The discussion also focuses more on why clean water is essential than on why household supply should specifically be free of charge. Develop that distinction by explaining how free provision could be funded and why it is preferable to affordable or subsidised access.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, paragraphs on the importance of water and its health consequences, and a concluding statement of your position. The ideas generally progress from basic survival to public-health concerns and then to affordability. You also use linking expressions such as “Again,” “So,” and “Another example.” At times, however, the links feel mechanical, and several points are placed together without a clear relationship—for example, the discussion moves from company bills to supply interruptions and then to diseases. The paragraph beginning “Clean water is a basic human right for all” would be clearer if grouped around one main claim, with examples ordered and connected to it. Use more precise referencing and transitions to show how each example supports your argument.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “bodily fluids,” “nutrients,” “contaminated,” “purifiers,” and “birth complication.” These choices allow you to discuss health, water quality, and access rather than relying only on basic terms. There are also several inaccurate or awkward choices that reduce precision, such as “water contiminated diseases,” “Companies bill water more than necessary,” and “an entire civilization in rome perished at the hands of an disease.” Spelling errors, including “contminated,” “countires,” and “chloera,” are noticeable and weaken the overall control of vocabulary. Aim to learn common collocations for this topic and proofread spelling; more precise phrasing will make your examples sound credible and your argument easier to follow.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both short statements and more developed structures, including the conditional “Our cells would die if there isn't enough water” and the clause “If access to clean water is made free of charge then many people can live healthier.” This shows some range, and the main meaning is usually understandable. However, errors in agreement, articles, and sentence construction recur: “one of the basic human right,” “Human body is made up,” and “every dealing include” need grammatical correction. There are also problems with plural forms and clause structure, as in “pregnant women also suffer from birth complication which may result in the death of mother or child.” Work on article use, subject–verb agreement, and singular/plural consistency, then check each sentence for a complete, correctly connected structure.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.