Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Clean water is the most fundamental human right. Every governoment should provide its residents with clean drinking and usable water free of Cost.

Water is the basic human necessity and human body can not survive without drinking water. Medical researches prove that a human body can not survive more than 3 days without drinking water. Therefore avalability of clean drinking water in every household and every public place should be considered as the fundamental right of every nation by there leaders and adminstration. The importaance of water is evident from the fact that human body consists of 70% water.

Humans need water for all chores of life from cleaning, cooking, washing to cultivation. Water is the backbone for survival of humans even for other animals on this planet. The importance of household availabilty of water is reflected from the examples of the nations who don't enjoy this facility. For example some countries in Africa and regions of thar and balochistan where drinking water is not available in households. These nations and people are lacking behind in all fields compared to the nations availing these facilities. When humans are deprived of baic necessities and their daily struggles revolve around bringing clean water from far off places. Such scenarios don't encourage creative minds instead survival for life begans which leads to the destruction of the nations.

Clean drinking and useable water supply in every house should be treated as the basic human right and must be the mondate of every nation. And it must be provided free of cost to every house in every city, town and countryside.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that households should receive clean water without charge, and you give relevant reasons, including water’s role in survival and daily activities. The examples of communities where water is not readily available also help illustrate the consequences of limited access. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, the claim that people in these regions are “lacking behind in all fields” is broad, and the link between water access and national development needs clearer support. The response also focuses mainly on why water is essential; it could address the “free of charge” aspect more directly by explaining how charging households affects poorer families or how governments might fund the supply. Developing these points would make the argument more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an opening position, two paragraphs giving reasons, and a concluding statement that restates your view. Ideas generally progress from water’s importance for survival to its role in household and community life. Some connections, however, are mechanical or unclear. “Therefore” introduces a related point, but the relationship between the body’s water content and the right to household supply is not fully explained. The sentence beginning “When humans are deprived…” is a fragment, and “Such scenarios” has a somewhat broad reference. The final paragraph also begins with “And,” which makes the conclusion feel less controlled. Use clearer links between claims and examples, and ensure each paragraph develops one central point in a logical sequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “fundamental human right,” “basic human necessity,” “household availability,” and “daily struggles.” These choices show an attempt to discuss the issue beyond very basic terms. However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural combinations reduce accuracy, as in “governoment,” “avalability,” “lacking behind,” and “mondate.” Some wording is also repetitive, particularly repeated references to “water” and “basic” necessities. Aim to check spelling carefully and choose collocations that express your meaning naturally. For example, describe communities as “lagging behind” rather than “lacking behind,” and use a precise phrase such as “a reliable household water supply.” Greater control of word choice would make the argument clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple statements and some longer structures, such as “Humans need water for all chores of life from cleaning, cooking, washing to cultivation.” This gives the response some sentence variety, and the main ideas are usually understandable. Some grammatical errors remain, including “human body can not survive” where an article is needed, and “When humans are deprived of basic necessities…” which is not a complete sentence. The sentence beginning “And it must be provided…” is also an awkward fragment after the previous sentence. Punctuation and sentence boundaries need more consistent control, especially where several ideas are joined together. Practise combining clauses accurately and checking that every sentence has a complete main clause; this will help you express complex ideas more clearly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.