Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Access to clean water is basic human right. Therefore every human should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. I strongly disagree with this as clean water is the basic necessity for all living beings and we must have to take proper precauntions to save the extra usage and waste of it. People value money and that's the only way to protect the extra use of clean waster for future generations.

First of all, if people get free of cost clean water they will not value the clean water. This is human nature we will never appreciate and take for granted things which we can get without any charge. The human only value their hard earn money and when they have to buy the clean water they will know the value of it and it will help to control the waste of clean water. When clean water is supplied to homes without any charge people will waste clean water without any responsibility.

Secondly, the need to save water for future generations is the main concern we all fully aware of. The specialists warn us through many mediums that clean water needed to be used very carfully and not to be wasted at all. They even guide us to take less time in showers and use minimun quantity of water while other chores of home. But people are not giving attention to the warnings. Therefore, it is very important to put charges on the usage of clean water, the water supple not be provided free of cost at homes either they must get monthly bills on the usage of water. For instance, people uses electricity very carefully at homes they make sure no extra blub or fan stay on without any need becuase they are aware of the electricity bills. That's the reason people use homehold stuff according to the bills they have to pay.

In conclusion, the clean water is one of the very precious blessing from the nature to humans that must not be wasted, and we have to save this blessing for our future generations. Therefore, the government should provide the charges on home water supply as people use water at home without any accoutability and that is the best way to prevent it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you disagree with free household water, mainly because charging may discourage waste and help conserve supplies for future generations. Both body paragraphs support this view, and the electricity-bill comparison gives a relevant example. However, the response focuses mostly on how payment might influence behaviour; it does not fully consider the opposing idea that basic water access should be guaranteed regardless of ability to pay. Some claims, such as people valuing only what they pay for, are broad and would benefit from explanation or evidence. Develop the conservation argument with a specific example, and acknowledge the human-rights concern before explaining why you still favour charges.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction states your view, two paragraphs present reasons, and a conclusion restates your position. Sequencing phrases such as “First of all,” “Secondly,” and “In conclusion” make the progression easy to follow. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical, and ideas within paragraphs are not always linked precisely. For example, the discussion moves from specialists’ warnings to household bills without clearly explaining how charges would address people’s failure to heed advice. Some references, including “it” in “it will help to control the waste,” are not fully precise. Use fewer formulaic transitions and build clearer links between each claim, explanation, and example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main ideas, including “future generations,” “usage,” “warnings,” and “accountability.” However, the range is limited by repeated use of “clean water,” “people,” and “free of cost,” and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors make the writing less natural. Examples include “clean waster,” “water supple,” “homehold stuff,” and “precious blessing from the nature.” These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding your position, but they reduce precision and sometimes cause difficulty. Build a wider set of accurate expressions for conservation, household consumption, and water pricing, and proofread spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, using structures such as “if people get free… they will not value” and “when they have to buy… they will know.” The overall meaning is generally understandable, but some errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and verb forms remain. For example, “Access to clean water is basic human right” needs an article, while “people uses electricity” has a subject–verb agreement error. The sentence beginning “This is human nature” also shifts awkwardly between “people” and “we.” Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and consistent verb form, and use a wider range of accurately controlled complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.