Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is believed that having access to clean water is a basic right of human beings, so every household should be provided with a water supply which is free of charge. In my opinion, although i believe that water is a basic facility and a right of every human to have its access at his home, providing it for free would result in serious consequences in the long term.

Water is a crucial source for human life and their existence on this planet. It is used in every aspect of life, from drinking to cooking, and from washing clothes to bathing. Similarly, clean water is also required by food crops like wheat and rice to grow. In contrast, contaminated water is disastrous for both humans and their food sources. For instance, heavy metals released in water streams in Karachi make it polluted, and when it was used by the locals, they got hepatitis, dierha and jaundice. Likewise, when the crops were watered with this water, they became poisonous and die in a week, creating food insecurity in the region. So clean water should be provided to every human being to secure their health and food source.

With regards to providing water for free, it would result in some serious consequences in the long term for people themselves. Firstly, in many parts of the world, people are not well educated about water usage, and they waste water doing their daily tasks. Its the water bill, which somehow prohibits them from wasting this noble resource. If they are provided with free water, they may not even care and would result in the depletion of underground water tables which their future generations would suffer. So charging a decent amount would control the water usage and ensure its safety and availability in future.

In conclusion, water is a precious source and a basic right of every human being, and the everyday tasks and food security is linked to the access of clean water. But providing it for free would have some drawbacks and charging a minimal amount to secure water is neceassary for future.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear throughout: you support access to clean water as a right but disagree that household supply should be entirely free. You address both sides of the question and give relevant support, including the health and crop effects of contaminated water in Karachi and the argument that charges can discourage waste. These explanations are extended enough to support your main view. To strengthen the response further, develop the distinction between guaranteeing access and charging for consumption: for example, explain how a basic amount could be free while excessive use is billed. The claim that water charges ensure its “safety and availability” is also asserted more than demonstrated, so a clearer link or supporting example would make the reasoning more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall structure: the introduction states your position, the body paragraphs move from the importance of clean water to the drawbacks of free provision, and the conclusion restates your view. Linking expressions such as “For instance,” “Likewise,” and “Firstly” help readers follow the examples and reasons. The progression is generally logical, although some connections are a little mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “So” to introduce conclusions. In the first body paragraph, the shift from human health to crop damage is relevant but could be signposted more explicitly. You could also make the relationship between the right to water and the proposed charge clearer, so the argument develops as one connected line rather than two separate claims.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “contaminated water,” “heavy metals,” “food insecurity,” and “underground water tables.” These terms help communicate the subject clearly, and the examples show some willingness to use more specific language. However, several choices or collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “a crucial source for human life,” “food crops like wheat and rice to grow,” and “secure their health and food source.” There are also spelling errors in “dierha” and “neceassary,” and “noble resource” sounds overly evaluative in this context. Aim for more natural combinations and check spelling carefully; this would make your vocabulary more precise without needing unnecessarily complex words.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex structures, including contrast clauses (“although I believe…”) and conditional reasoning (“If they are provided with free water…”). Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “every human to have its access at his home” has unclear pronoun reference and an awkward structure; “when it was used by the locals, they got…” shifts from plural “streams” to singular “it”; and “they may not even care and would result” does not maintain a consistent subject. There are also agreement and sentence-boundary issues in “the everyday tasks and food security is linked.” Review pronoun reference, subject–verb agreement, and parallel verb forms, while retaining your attempts at complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.