Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

every home should have a supply of clean water free of charge because acess to clean wate is a basic human right. I strongly agree with the statement and in this essay I will give my reasons about it First of all, water is a basic nessaccity and life without water would be un imaginable

zcess to clean water will result in a good public health because many waterbone dieseases caused by polluted water for example various dieseases like cholera typhoid etc as a result clean water will prevent many fatal dieseases.Moreover, it will be a sign of equality among common public

futhermore, clean water willl help children to groww healtherand will reduce the risk of illness which can affect their education. Also clean water will bring economical benefits because a healthier population will work more effectively, contributing to economic growth and national development

In conclusion, although it will require a huge budget also goverment responsibility will increase because public awareness should be needed, spply to clean water is nesseccary because acess to this essential resource should deprnd on need rather than wealth

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

Your position is clear: you strongly agree that homes should receive clean water free of charge. You give relevant reasons, including preventing waterborne illness, promoting equality, supporting children’s health and education, and improving economic productivity. However, these points are mostly asserted rather than explained or supported with specific examples; for instance, the link between free provision and equality needs clarification. The conclusion briefly acknowledges the budget and government responsibility, but does not develop this counterpoint or explain how it affects your position. The response also does not meet the required minimum length, so there is limited space to develop the argument. Extend each main reason with explanation or a relevant example, and address the cost issue more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable overall shape: an introduction, a sequence of supporting points, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “First of all,” “furthermore,” “Moreover,” and “In conclusion” helps show how the ideas relate. However, the progression is not consistently clear: several reasons are crowded together without distinct paragraphing, and the shift from public health to equality and then children’s education is abrupt. Some linking is mechanical, while the conclusion introduces government responsibility without connecting it clearly to the earlier argument. Use separate body paragraphs for related points, and make each paragraph develop one central idea with a clear explanation and example. This would make the organisation easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “public health,” “polluted water,” “fatal diseases,” “economic benefits,” and “national development.” These choices show an attempt to discuss the issue beyond very basic terms. However, the range is limited and several spelling errors or imprecise expressions make the writing harder to read, such as “acess,” “waterbone,” “nessaccity,” and “economical benefits.” Some phrases are also unnatural, including “a sign of equality among common public” and “public awareness should be needed.” Aim for accurate spelling and more natural collocations, such as “equal access for all” and “raise public awareness.” Building a small set of precise water- and policy-related phrases would help you express your ideas more clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, for example the sentence linking a healthier population with economic growth. The main ideas are generally understandable, but the range of sentence structures is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to interrupt the flow. In “water is a basic necessity and life without water would be unimaginable,” the ideas need clearer punctuation or a conjunction. The final sentence also has an unclear structure, particularly around “although it will require a huge budget also government responsibility will increase.” Work on joining clauses accurately, using punctuation to separate complete ideas, and checking subject–verb agreement and articles. Practising a few reliable complex patterns will help you express cause, contrast, and consequence more accurately.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.