Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Drinkable water is a compulsory for every human being. As water is a natural resource and essential for human life, I largely believe that goverment should ensure free water that can be drinked to every household.

States are obliged to support their citizen's basic human rights. Among the five needs that are considered as basic human rights and important to survive, clean water is one. If people do not have easy access to pure water, it can affect them physically. For example, multiple villagers suffer from cholera, diarrheoa and typhoid because they consume unfiltered water that contain different germs. Moreover, they can not afford to buy a purifier in their home to get rid of all the detrimental particles from their drinking water.

On ther other hand, boiling drinking water can help to clean it to some extent. Nevertheless, the rise of chemical ingredients in local water is so high that most of it can not be removed by boiling. On top of that, those chemicals can be so harmful for health, For instance, arsenic is one of the known heavy metals that is found in water and can cause severe health risks and needless to say, a large number of rural people get affected by arsenic every year. Therefore, I agree that authority should acknowledge the need of free drinkable water and subsidise the supply of it.

To conclude, clean water is already a major crisis and it is hard for underpriviledged people to afford any digital way to purify the regular water. Hence, govement should take proper measure so that the situation doesnot exacerbate and one of the most effecting one can be supplying free water to each home.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you largely agree that the government should provide safe water to every household, and this view is maintained in the conclusion. You give relevant support through examples of waterborne illnesses and arsenic contamination, explaining why access to clean water matters. This addresses the task and provides a developed line of argument. However, the response focuses mainly on the health case for clean water and gives less attention to the specific claim that the supply should be free. The point about villagers being unable to afford purifiers is relevant, but the essay could explain more directly how free household provision would work or why charging for water is unjust. Avoid broad claims such as “among the five needs” without clarifying them or supporting them.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting related points, and a conclusion. The progression from waterborne disease to chemical contamination is easy to follow, and signposts such as “Moreover,” “Nevertheless,” and “To conclude” help show relationships between ideas. This gives the response a coherent arrangement. To make the organisation more flexible and precise, ensure each paragraph develops one central point and connect the evidence explicitly to the argument for free provision. The contrast introduced by “On the other hand” is not fully clear, since boiling water does not oppose the preceding point so much as offer an incomplete solution. Some transitions feel formulaic, and references such as “it” and “one” in the conclusion could be made more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “basic human rights,” “unfiltered water,” “detrimental particles,” “heavy metals,” and “subsidise.” These choices help communicate the health and policy issues, and some less common terms show an attempt to be precise. However, several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors reduce naturalness: “drinkable” is used where “safe drinking water” would fit better, “digital way to purify” appears to mean a purification method, and “effecting one” is not the intended expression. There are also misspellings such as “goverment,” “underpriviledged,” and “doesnot.” Check that technical terms and modifiers express the intended meaning, and proofread spelling and word forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional clauses (“If people do not have easy access…”) and a concession introduced by “Nevertheless.” Meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make sentences awkward. For example, “a compulsory for every human being” has an article and structure problem, while “water that contain different germs” has subject–verb disagreement. In “most of it can not be removed,” the pronoun reference and verb form need attention, and the long sentence beginning “For instance, arsenic…” would benefit from clearer punctuation and sentence boundaries. Review articles, agreement, and clause construction, and aim to produce more consistently accurate complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.