Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Water is the basic nned of life so every person should be enjoy pure and free cost of water to fulfill their basic need of life. Here i will justify my point of view along its crucial role in human beings life.

The foremost argument justify my stand is that purified water plays avital role for living organisams. Morever , people cant live without drinking water for a some time. As well as the body of human being consist on 60% of water proportion. On the other hand, the shortage of water leads to destructiob of cells as well as tissues which, leads to dehydration of water. For example,people living in desserts are suffering with shortage of clean water.Wherease, people living in rural areasalso facing challenge of clean water.

Furthermore, the noticeable point is availibility of refined water to every home. In other case, plenty of homes have no accessibility to higenic water which leads to severe fatal diseases. Further, many people living in drastic condition to fullfil their basic need. Therefore, they are unable to pay extra charges for water supply.People should be provoded with water with no charges. For example,people of rural areas as well as low class folks.

To conclude, i am strongly agree with all these aspects. At the end, no one can deny the importance of water in our daily life. However, WASA should organise supply of clean water to every person.The government should facilitate all villages as well as cities with filter plant to overcome shortage of clean water.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that households should receive clean water without charge, and the response stays focused on access, health and affordability. The points about dehydration and people in rural areas help explain why water matters, while the discussion of households unable to pay adds a relevant reason for free provision. However, some ideas are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, the reference to “fatal diseases” does not name or explain a consequence, and the examples of rural residents and “low class folks” are not developed with specific detail. The final recommendation about filter plants is relevant, but its connection to free household supply could be made clearer. Develop each main reason with a fuller explanation or a concrete example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present reasons, and a conclusion restates your position and offers recommendations. Linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “For example,” and “To conclude” help signal the stages of the argument. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. “On the other hand” introduces a consequence of water shortage rather than a contrasting point, and “In other case” does not clearly show how the next idea relates to the previous one. The examples are also attached abruptly, and the conclusion moves quickly from agreement to government action. Use transitions that express the precise relationship between ideas, and connect examples directly to the claims they support.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “dehydration,” “shortage,” “accessibility,” and “water supply,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “plays a vital role.” However, the range and control are limited by repeated or inaccurate word choices and spelling. Phrases such as “free cost of water,” “body … consist on,” and “drastic condition” are not natural in this context, while misspellings such as “availibility,” “higenic,” and “organisams” make the writing less clear. Some expressions, including “low class folks,” are also imprecise or unsuitable for an academic essay. Build accuracy by learning common collocations for water access and poverty, and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a cause-and-effect clause in “the shortage of water leads to…” and a relative clause in “which leads to severe fatal diseases.” The overall meaning is usually understandable, but errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction occur across the response. For example, “every person should be enjoy” needs a different verb pattern, and “I am strongly agree” uses an incorrect construction. In “the body of human being consist,” the subject and verb do not agree, and the sentence needs clearer article use. Some punctuation and spacing also make sentence boundaries harder to follow. Practise accurate basic clauses first, then extend them with subordinate clauses while checking each sentence’s subject and verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.