Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Getting the access of pure water is the fundamental right of every individuals so free of cost water supply should be enable in every household . This essay agrees with this statement because it will help poorer people and it improves public health

Clean and fresh water saves money for needier people as some pupils are not financially stable to afford the expense of buying water . Getting the access of clean water at home will also saves them time and their labour in finding cheap water as the result the economy also stables and it improves government image . For instance some people who spent money on buying water can now utilize this money in getting other neccessities like food and shelter etc .

Overall health of people changes and gets improve by drinking fresh water because drinking contaminated and dirty water is a source of many water borne diseases . people who couldnot afford clean water tends to drink and use dirty water as the result they become the prey of many deadly diseases that arises from drinking contaminated water hence lots of precious lifes are lost. For instance , a recent study shows that many people lose their life in fighting dangue and malaria caused by drinking contaminated water .

In conclusion, every human being has a right to get clean water and its supply should be held in every house without paying for it a

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you agree that households should receive clean water without charge, and you give two relevant reasons—helping people with limited means and protecting public health. The examples about using saved money for food and shelter and the risks of contaminated water support these points. However, both arguments remain quite general, and the claim that free water would make “the economy” stable or improve the government’s image is not explained. The disease example also needs greater accuracy and development. The response is 11 words below the required minimum, so it does not fully meet the task’s length requirement. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation or a specific, relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion that restates your view. This helps the reader follow the main line of argument. You also use linking expressions such as “For instance,” “because,” and “In conclusion.” However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear: the first body paragraph moves from household savings to labour, the economy, and government image without showing how these ideas connect. Phrases such as “as the result” are repeated and do not always link ideas smoothly. Use clearer topic sentences and develop one main point at a time, with more precise referencing and transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “fundamental right,” “public health,” “contaminated water,” and “water-borne diseases,” so the reader can understand your main ideas. There are also attempts to use less common expressions, such as “financially stable” and “precious lives.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive: “Getting the access of” and “the economy also stables” are not natural English, while “pure water” is less precise here than “clean drinking water.” Spelling errors such as “neccessities,” “dangue,” and “couldnot” also reduce accuracy. Build a bank of natural topic collocations and check spelling carefully before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a reason clause with “because” and a result clause introduced by “as the result.” This shows some effort to vary sentence structure. However, errors are frequent and sometimes make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. Examples include “every individuals,” “water supply should be enable,” “it will also saves,” and “people … tends,” which show problems with agreement and verb forms. Articles and sentence boundaries also need attention, as in “Overall health of people changes” and the run-on sequence beginning “people who couldnot afford.” Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and verb patterns, and separate long sentences into clear clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.