Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-31

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

There is an argument that drinking clean water is a basic human right. Thus, every home should have a free access to it. I disagree with this view as it could affect water supply negatively, and it could decrease water's value.

Although drinking clean water is a basic human right, it shouldn't be totally free. If it didn't cost to use pure water, people would use it in inappropriate ways such as cleaning their car daily, wasting clean water. This could eventually affect water supply to run out for the entire country. For instance, were governments to make water free of charge, the total consumption of water would increase and it would give unnessary pressure to water plants, which could fail because of the sharp increase in water use. As a result, the water supply of the country could be interfered, making living conditions unfavorable not only for humans, but also for natural entities.

Water is known as the main supplier of life, providing favorable condition to all living animals and plants. If it were distributed to homes without any costs, people would regard is a valueless and the public awareness on water value would decrease. For example, some people would save water because it takes a sum of money out of their wallet. However, if it didn't cost a penny, those people would consume it without any limits. Even some scientists and researchers say that a bottle of water will be more valueable than a bar of gold in the future. Therefore, it is vital for the humanity to keep the water valueable.

In conclusion, water shouldn't be made totally free and it should cost some money, so that it would have a value and people would save it or at least not waste it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction and conclusion: you disagree with making water entirely free. Both body paragraphs give relevant reasons—possible overuse and reduced public appreciation—and the examples about car washing and household saving help explain your view. This meets the task well, and the conditional example about governments making water free shows an attempt to develop the argument. However, some claims are asserted rather than fully explained: for instance, the link between higher consumption and water plants failing needs more support, and the prediction that water will become more valuable than gold is attributed vaguely to “some scientists and researchers.” Develop these points with clearer evidence or reasoning, and acknowledge how affordable access could still protect the basic right you recognise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your position, each body paragraph presents a separate reason, and the conclusion restates your view. Ideas generally progress in a logical order, and linking expressions such as “For instance,” “As a result,” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. This is a coherent arrangement, though some connections are mechanical or unclear. In the first body paragraph, the move from increased consumption to water plants failing and then to harm to natural entities would benefit from more explicit explanation. The second paragraph also shifts from public awareness to a prediction about future water value without a strong link. Use referencing more precisely and vary transitions so that relationships between claims are clear rather than simply signposted.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “water supply,” “consumption,” “public awareness,” and “distributed,” and you attempt less common expressions such as “unnecessary pressure” and “living conditions unfavorable.” These choices make the argument understandable, but some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural. For example, “free access” is better expressed as “access free of charge,” “water supply to run out” is awkward, and “regard is a valueless” does not convey the intended meaning correctly. There are also spelling errors in “unnessary” and “valueable.” Aim for precise, natural combinations and check spelling and word forms; this will make your vocabulary more flexible and convincing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional forms such as “If it didn’t cost to use pure water” and the inverted conditional “were governments to make water free of charge.” These attempts show useful range, and the main meaning is generally clear. Some grammatical errors remain, however. In “people would regard is a valueless,” the object and complement structure is faulty; “people would regard it as valueless” is the correct pattern. “Providing favorable condition” needs a plural noun, and “it shouldn’t be totally free” shifts from the general argument into a less consistent reference. Review articles, plurals, pronouns, and verb patterns, while retaining your complex sentences. More consistently accurate control would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.