Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-31

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Hundreds of millions of people around the world struggling for the clean drinking water. Water is not a luxury its a basic human need. A human can survive without food for months but without water only for few days.Every body, every crop, every industry and every instituition depends on this. United nations realizes this in 2010 and declearing access to clean drinking water abasic human right.Many of the NGOs aroud the world now working on supply of clean and fresh water to the people starving of thrist.

The areas where clean drining water is not easily accsessible people struggle a lot to get it. they have to travel many miles to get the water for their family and animals.Girls often leave school to get water and miss thier chance on education. When people are healty and have time they work, learn to build better future. Free water is therefore not a charity, it is an investment in the whole society.

contaminated water on the other hand causing many diseases in areas where clean drinking water is hard to get. It spreads typhoid, cholera and diarrhea which claim many young lives each year.

Providing a free basic amount to everyone would close this unfair gap and give every child an equal start in life. A world that build skyscrapers and send rockets into the sky an provide fresh and clean water to evry door where it needed. Water is life and life should never be sold.It is apromise we owe to every human being.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you support free access to water, and you give relevant reasons, including the burden of collecting water, the effect on girls’ education, and illness caused by contaminated supplies. The point that free water is “an investment in the whole society” also helps explain the wider benefit. This addresses the task, but some ideas are asserted rather than fully explained. For example, the claim that a free basic amount would give every child “an equal start” could be linked more explicitly to how reliable household access improves health or education. The response also does not consider the practical distinction between a basic free supply and unlimited household use, which would make the argument more fully developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a generally coherent sequence: it introduces water as a human need, describes the hardship of obtaining it, explains health consequences, and concludes with a call for universal provision. Paragraphing helps separate these stages, and phrases such as “on the other hand” and “therefore” signal relationships between ideas. However, some connections are abrupt: the discussion moves from access and education to disease without a clear transition, and the final paragraph combines several claims without developing their links. Referencing is occasionally unclear, and sentence boundaries and capitalization make the progression harder to follow. Use clearer topic sentences and connect each example directly to the argument for free household provision.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “clean drinking water,” “contaminated water,” “basic human right,” and “investment in the whole society.” These choices communicate the central ideas, and terms such as “typhoid” and “cholera” add specificity. However, spelling errors and inaccurate word forms are frequent enough to reduce precision, as in “instituition,” “declearing,” “thrist,” and “accsessible.” Some expressions are also unnatural or imprecise, such as “people starving of thirst” and “a world that build skyscrapers.” Aim to check spelling carefully and choose standard collocations. A more controlled range of precise vocabulary would make the argument clearer and more persuasive.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex structures, including the contrast in “A human can survive without food for months but without water only for few days” and the conditional idea “where clean drinking water is not easily accessible.” However, grammatical errors occur throughout and sometimes make the reader pause. Examples include missing verbs in “Hundreds of millions of people around the world struggling,” incorrect verb forms in “contaminated water … causing many diseases” and “a world that build,” and missing articles in “for few days.” Sentence boundaries and punctuation are also inconsistent, with run-on sentences and missing spaces after full stops. Practise complete clauses, subject–verb agreement, articles, and accurate sentence punctuation while retaining your attempts at complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.