Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Clean water is considered as the basic necessity of life. Some people believe that access to filtered water should be free of cost while other argue with this idea and think that everyone should pay a certain amount to get its supply. I believe that clean water should be available to everyone without any price.

As per some people, if clean water is available readily without any charges, it will lose its worth. People will start taking it for granted and they will end up wasting it. Due to rise in global warming, coming generations will face the shortages of safe water and for that we need to keep its check.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You state a clear position in the introduction: “I believe that clean water should be available to everyone without any price.” You also introduce a relevant counterargument—that free water may be taken for granted and wasted—and connect scarcity to future generations. However, the response addresses the question only minimally: it gives no developed reasons supporting your own position, does not explain how free household supply could be managed, and provides no relevant example. The final paragraph discusses the opposing view but does not resolve it or show why your position is stronger. The response is also below the required 250 words, leaving the argument substantially incomplete. Develop both your reasoning and supporting examples, and make sure every part of the question is answered.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introductory paragraph presents the issue and your view, followed by a paragraph introducing a counterargument. Connectors such as “while” and “Due to” help show relationships between ideas. However, the progression stops before your own argument is explained, and there is no concluding paragraph to bring the discussion together. The shift from the claim that free water causes waste to the prediction of future shortages needs a clearer explanation of how these points relate. In a longer response, use separate paragraphs for your position, opposing view and conclusion, and link each paragraph with clear references and transitions rather than leaving the reader to infer the argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “basic necessity,” “filtered water,” “wasting it,” and “shortages of safe water,” so the main subject is clear. There is also an attempt to express abstract ideas such as water being “taken for granted.” However, the range is limited in this short response, and several phrases are awkward or imprecise: “free of cost,” “argue with this idea,” and “keep its check” do not sound natural in this context. Aim for accurate collocations and a wider range of terms for access, affordability, conservation and public provision. For example, “provided free of charge” and “monitor water use” would express your ideas more naturally and precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple sentences and a longer conditional structure: “if clean water is available readily without any charges, it will lose its worth.” This shows an attempt to connect ideas through a complex sentence, and the overall meaning remains understandable. However, there are errors in agreement and article use, as in “other argue” and “the basic necessity of life.” The phrase “for that we need to keep its check” also has an unclear grammatical construction. Most sentences follow straightforward patterns, so the response does not yet demonstrate a broad range of structures. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement, articles and sentence patterns, then use varied complex sentences to explain causes, consequences and qualifications.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.