Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Amoung the essential needs of a human being having access to clean or filtered water is one.For which having access to clean water should be free of charge. i strongely bealive that having clean water for free is completely essential for everyone in the society.

Charging for clean supply of water might create scarcity amoung the poorer households. it would not be benefiting them anyhow . Charging them for clean water supply might reduce the chances if them having it at all . As the poorer households have a tight budget for themselve for which having an additional expense for water would simply create a lot of pressure for them. It would reducing the chances of them having it at all . For this reason the amount of diseases occuring inbetween the country would be increasing significantly. furthermore leading to create more unemployement in the country for this now the citizens earnings would reduce as now they wont be able to fend for themselves hence creating unemployemnt in the country . This would lead to reduce the living standards of the indivisuals. It would certainly be effecting the government as now they would have to spend more on health care services than before. Which they could simply resolve the problem by providing water suppy for free from the very start. An example that i could provide would be Africa. Its a continent that proves all the statements that i have mentioned above.

However, providing the water supply for free might also disrupt the economy as now the residents might over use the water that is being provided to them for free. This might create a shortage in the water supplies . This could mainly occur for the less fortunate countries out in the world. Furthermore it can be said that it could be said that it might be a problem for the government as providing free water supply is not cheap cause filtering and processing the water for it to be drinkable needs a lot of intial investment for which now the government might need to borrow from the neighboring countries. Hence increasing there expenses and might create a burden for them.

Overall, in my prespective i believe that water supply shouldnt be completely free of cost rather now the fortunates ones should pay a certain percentage for the water supply and the unfortunates ones shouldnt have to pay. however now the government could also impose a fine that ciuld be charge for the over use of water. hence helping them to earn extra revenue for supplying water free of cost to the poorer onces in the society.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you support free access for poorer households, while arguing that wealthier residents should contribute and that overuse should be penalised. You address both the benefits and drawbacks of universal free provision, including affordability, public health, government costs and water shortages. This gives the response a relevant, balanced basis. However, some claims are asserted rather than explained: the link between water charges, unemployment and lower living standards is difficult to follow, and the reference to Africa is too broad to function as a specific example. To strengthen the response, develop fewer points with clearer reasoning and explain how your proposed means-tested system would work in practice.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph on the effects of charging poorer households, a counterargument about free provision, and a concluding position. Ideas generally progress from affordability to possible economic and resource consequences. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical or unclear. Repeated phrases such as “create a lot of pressure” and “reduce the chances of them having it at all” make the first body paragraph circular, while “Furthermore it can be said that it could be said” adds unnecessary repetition. Some links between ideas are also abrupt, particularly the move from disease to unemployment. Use clearer topic sentences, remove repeated claims, and make each sentence’s relationship to the previous one explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “scarcity,” “living standards,” “health care services,” “water supplies,” and “revenue,” which helps communicate the main argument. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “impose a fine” and “initial investment.” However, spelling errors and inaccurate word choices are noticeable, including “Amoung,” “strongely,” “bealive,” “unemployemnt,” and “prespective.” Some expressions are imprecise or unnatural, such as “the amount of diseases occuring inbetween the country” and “the fortunates ones.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully; this will make your ideas easier to understand and give your vocabulary more flexibility and precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, using clauses with “as,” “for which,” and “hence,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, control is limited, especially in longer sentences, where clause connections and verb forms are often faulty. For example, “It would reducing the chances” should use a correctly formed verb, and “the amount of diseases … would be increasing” has an awkward agreement and tense pattern. Several sentences are fragments or are joined unclearly, such as “Which they could simply resolve the problem…” and “Hence increasing there expenses.” Capitalisation and punctuation are also inconsistent. Practise building shorter, complete sentences first, then combine them with accurate subordinate clauses and check subject–verb agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.