Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some people argue that achieve to clean water is a basic human right. So, every home should have a water provided that is provided without any charges. I firmly agree with this statement.

To commence with, people can save from many diseases if they drink clean water. To elaborate it, clean water is significantly crucial for them. Moreover, they become healthy and fit if they drink water without germs. germs in water can damage people health and make them weake. Majority can do there work well if they are healthy. Clean water boost people energy levels. For instance, recent reports show that approximately sixty five percent diseases are occur due to the lack of clean water.

Furthermore, it will become be beneficial for poor families that the government provide clean water free of low income families. In other words, numerous people cannot access clean water due to their expenses. In addition, they could not have much money for buy clean water. So, if the state provide them clean water free they become happy and healthy. Additionally, they can manage their expenses conveniently if they have clean water free. For example, many low-income communities rely on government-funded water filtration plants to get safe drinking water without any cost.

"In conclusion" clean water save people with many diseases. Clean water also increase energy level of majority. It is also very helpful for poor families that accessing clean water free. So, i agree with the notation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the introduction (“I firmly agree”) and conclusion, and you give two relevant reasons: clean water can protect health, and free provision can help low-income families. The examples about waterborne illness and filtration plants support these points, but the claims are brief and not fully explained; for instance, the statistic about diseases is not linked to a specific source or clarified. The response therefore addresses the question only partially, with ideas that remain limited and under-developed. It is also 15 words below the 250-word minimum; the eight words copied from the task prompt do not count toward the required length. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation or a specific, credible example, and add enough relevant discussion to meet the minimum.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “Furthermore,” and “For instance” help signal additions and examples. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes repetitive or unclear. In the first body paragraph, several sentences repeat that clean water improves health and energy without showing how the ideas connect. The conclusion also repeats earlier points rather than drawing them together, and quotation marks around “In conclusion” are unnecessary. Use fewer, more precise transitions and organise each paragraph around one main claim, followed by explanation and evidence, so the argument develops more clearly.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “germs,” “low-income families,” “government-funded,” and “water filtration plants,” which helps communicate the subject. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors make parts of the response awkward or less clear. Examples include “achieve to clean water,” “water provided that is provided,” “save from many diseases,” and “the notation.” There are also spelling errors such as “weake” and “there” where “their” is intended. Aim for accurate, natural phrases rather than adding formal-sounding expressions. Learning collocations such as “access clean water,” “prevent waterborne diseases,” and “provide a free water supply” would make your argument clearer and more appropriate for an academic essay.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple sentences and longer conditional structures, such as “if they drink clean water” and “if the state provide them clean water free.” However, the range is limited, and frequent errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction sometimes make the meaning difficult to follow. For example, “diseases are occur” should use a single verb form, while “Clean water boost” and “clean water save” need subject–verb agreement. The sentence beginning “Furthermore, it will become be beneficial” also contains an incorrect verb construction. Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and correctly formed verb, then build more accurate complex sentences using “because,” “which,” and “if.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.