Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

One of the most important and basic human right is to access clean water, and every individuals house should be provided that for completely free. I agree with this sentiment because it is a basic human need, which if not available, the person will not be able to survive for not more than 3 days.

According to the science 65% of a persons body is made up of water, and we need it ever single day. Majority of the developing countries have one common issue, which is "Water Scarcity", most of the population is not provided with the access to pure drinkable water.

Furthermore, if they are lucky to get access, most of the time they are charged with unreasonable prices which a common folk can never afford. For instance, in Pakistan 60% of the population lives under poverty, and none of them have access to drinkable water. Recently, in the desert of thar, more than 55 children were dead because of clean water supply shortage to that region.

In conclusion, sometimes it can be expensive for governments to provide it for completely free, but if considered how serious of a matter it is to a common individual and when the minimum consequence is death than every price is justifible in giving this facility.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that households should receive clean water without charge, and you give relevant reasons based on survival, affordability and water scarcity. The example about children in Thar also helps illustrate the consequences of inadequate supply. However, some points are asserted rather than explained: for example, the claim that 60% of Pakistan’s population lives in poverty is not clearly connected to whether water should be free for every household. The conclusion briefly acknowledges the cost to governments, but does not explain how this concern could be addressed. The response is also 36 words below the required minimum, leaving limited space to develop your reasoning and address the issue more fully. Extend your explanation and support claims with precise examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, the body paragraphs present reasons and an example, and the conclusion restates the position. Linking expressions such as “Furthermore” and “In conclusion” help signal the stages of the argument. However, the progression between ideas is sometimes abrupt. The paragraph about water scarcity moves quickly from developing countries to prices, poverty in Pakistan and deaths in Thar, without clearly showing how each point supports free household provision. Some references, such as “they” in the discussion of people who may receive water, could be made more precise. Develop each paragraph around one main point and use clearer links between evidence and your argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “water scarcity,” “drinkable water,” “poverty” and “supply shortage,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “basic human need” and “unreasonable prices.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, including “provided that for completely free,” “a common folk,” and “every price is justifible.” Spelling errors such as “ever” for “every” and “justifible” also reduce accuracy. Aim for natural, precise expressions and check spelling carefully. A broader range of vocabulary for discussing public services, affordability and government funding would help you express the argument more flexibly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple sentences and some more complex forms, including the conditional clause “if not available” and the concession beginning “sometimes it can be expensive for governments.” The main argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors occur across the response. For example, “One of the most important and basic human right” has a number-agreement problem, while “every individuals house” has errors in the determiner and possessive form. In “the minimum consequence is death,” the clause structure is also awkward. Review subject–verb agreement, singular and plural forms, articles, and possessives. Building more accurate complex sentences will allow you to explain causes and consequences without losing clarity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.