Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Water is a basic need for every living being. Without using water not a single soul can survive a day. If the subject is about clean water than it is more significant than having just water. I agree with this view point that every human should get access to clean water easily for their daily use and it should be at free of cost. I will explain my stance in the following paragraphs along with an appropriate conclusion.

To support my agreement with the given statement, I strongly believe that water is as priceless as breath. We need water in every phase of our life, such as for drinking, for cleaning, for taking bath and so on . But, if the water we are using is not pure, it will create a lots of issues in our life. For example, we are drinking water from a river, which is not clean. As a result, our health can be affected and also can lead to a serious health problem. Therefore, as a human of a modern society we can expect to get clean and healthy water for our well being.

There is another point to be addressed, as we are living in a developing country, we should not think that everyone can purchase water for their daily usages. For instance, a poor family needs 25 litters of water and it cost around 500 TK then it is quite impossible to afford that kind of cost for the family. Consequently, they will use unhealthly water and it will increase their health concern. So, there are some measures to be taken by the government and the society that can help every individuals to ensure the clean water and also they can get it without paying any money.

In conclusion, clean water is a human right and it should be accessable by any human at free of cost. I am convinced that the aforementioned arguments strongly justify my viewpoint.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you agree that clean water should be available to everyone free of charge, and the conclusion restates this view. You address both the human-rights argument and affordability, with relevant examples such as unsafe river water and a poor family facing a stated water cost. However, the two supporting points are not developed equally. The health argument explains the risk of contaminated water, while the affordability example would be stronger if you explained how free household provision could be funded or managed, and why it should cover all homes. Some claims, such as water being “as priceless as breath,” are asserted rather than explored. More specific reasoning would make the response more fully convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting reasons, and a conclusion. The progression from health risks to affordability is logical, and signposts such as “For example,” “As a result,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. At times, however, linking is mechanical, with several sentences beginning with “So,” “Therefore,” or “Consequently.” Some references are also unclear: “they” in the final sentence of the third paragraph could refer to the government, society, or individuals. The introduction promises an explanation “along with an appropriate conclusion,” which adds little to the argument. Use transitions more selectively and make pronoun references explicit to improve the flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough vocabulary to discuss access, health, and affordability, including “human right,” “daily use,” “pure,” and “afford.” There are also attempts at more expressive language, such as “as priceless as breath,” though this sounds less natural in an academic argument. Several word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems reduce precision: “at free of cost,” “daily usages,” “unhealthly,” and “accessable” are not accurate forms. “Health concern” is also vague where you mean health problems or risks. Aim for natural academic collocations and check spelling and word forms carefully. A more precise vocabulary range would help you express the policy argument without relying on repeated general terms such as “water” and “clean.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional and result structures such as “if the water we are using is not pure, it will create…” and “As a result…”. The main ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors occur. For example, “Without using water not a single soul can survive a day” has an awkward negative construction; “a lots of issues” has incorrect number agreement; and “it should be accessable by any human” uses an incorrect passive pattern. There are also punctuation and sentence-boundary issues, such as the space before the full stop in “and so on .” and the comma splice in “There is another point to be addressed, as we are living…”. Review agreement, articles, and clause boundaries, while continuing to use varied sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.