Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Access to clean water for drinking as well as for daily usage is a basic human right that every person should get, irrespective of their region, race, nationality, colour, iconomic status, etc. I agree with the statement that water should be supplied free of charge to every household, however, I also think that, certain amount of monetary compensation should be imposed for excess water usage and wasting ground water.

Water is the most necessary and irreplacable element in the nature and people should not pay to get the access to it. People who live under the poverty line will not be able to pay for the water bill. As a result, they will have to rely on impure water sources. For instance, using contaminated water might cause an outbreak of many deadly waterborne diseases in a country. Furthermore, if general people get affected to diseases frequently due to the denied access of clean water, the health sector will face major difficulty handling the crowd in the health institutions. Subsequently, a country may experience more drawbacks than benefitted by collecting water ulities.

However, the coin has its opposite side also. Sometimes, people forget the fact that the sources of clean drinkable water are limited, thus, water level is going down further day by day, meanwhile waste water excessively. If such over exercise continues without thinking rationally, drinkable water will human being will have to suffer for every drop of clean water in the near future. Therefore, I agree that water should be free of charge in every household, however, with exception of limiting the consumption upto a certain usage level. After exceeding the monthly permitted water allocation, a specific charge or penalty should be applied.

To conclude, I completely agree that every home should have the access of pure water without getting charged for it as of a basic human right. Nevertheless, there should also be system of paying charge after reaching the monthly allocation of water use as a healthy check and balance to prevent overuse of water.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear throughout: you support free access to a basic household supply while accepting charges for excessive use. You address both the human-rights argument and the need to conserve limited water, and the examples about contaminated sources and pressure on health services help extend your reasoning. The conclusion also restates your position consistently. This is a well-focused response, although some claims are broad—for example, that people below the poverty line would have to rely on impure sources—and the conservation argument would be stronger with a clearer explanation of how the free allocation should be set or protected. Developing that practical detail and making the examples more specific would strengthen an already relevant and supported response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear four-paragraph structure, moving from your position to the affordability argument, then to conservation, and finally to a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “As a result,” “Furthermore,” and “To conclude” make the progression easy to follow, and the contrast between the two main arguments is apparent. Some transitions are less natural or slightly mechanical, particularly “However, the coin has its opposite side also,” and the repeated “however” in the opening and third paragraphs. The sentence beginning “If such over exercise continues” also interrupts the flow because its meaning is difficult to follow. Use more precise transitions and ensure each sentence connects clearly to the point before it.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use a reasonably varied vocabulary for the topic, including “contaminated water sources,” “waterborne diseases,” “monthly permitted water allocation,” and “overuse.” These choices show an attempt to discuss public health and conservation precisely. However, several spelling, word-choice, and collocation errors reduce naturalness: “iconomic,” “irreplacable,” “water ulities,” and “over exercise” are inaccurate, while “benefitted by collecting” does not express your intended meaning clearly. Phrases such as “daily usage” and “drinkable water” are understandable but could be more idiomatic in this context. This range is adequate and sometimes flexible, but more accurate spelling and natural collocations are needed for stronger control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional clauses such as “If such over exercise continues” and cause-and-effect sentences beginning “As a result.” Most of your meaning remains understandable, but some grammatical errors occur in sentence construction, articles, and clause formation. For example, “I also think that, certain amount” has incorrect punctuation and is missing an article, while “the health sector will face major difficulty handling the crowd” needs more accurate number and structure. The sentence “drinkable water will human being will have to suffer” contains a broken clause that obscures the intended meaning. Review article use, sentence boundaries, and the construction of longer sentences; clearer control would make your varied structures more effective.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.