Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-07-25
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The plans below show the site of a farm in 1950 and the same site today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The two maps illustrates distinguish between 1950 and same site today in Beechwood Farm.
Overall, it is evident that technological globalization has affected substantially which becomes daily of this Farm into modern.
In the north of the map, there was area in which sheep used to obtain their nutrition by grass in 1950 whereas parking, camping field and solar panels were constructed by the tree today.
In the center of the Farm, it is clear that the road was built and connected with barn which was track previous times and barn used to located in the east of the area but now holiday cottage is left side. Moreover, there is now farm shop near the highway.In the Beechwood Farm there is substantial figures that have not modified over time such as fruit trees, soft fruits,vegetables,chickens and the river.The water supply was river which has also changed and watering the rural community.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses the task by identifying key changes between the 1950 and current maps. However, the overview is problematic; it mentions 'technological globalization,' which is an external interpretation not supported by the visual data. While the main features like the camping field, solar panels, and holiday cottages are mentioned, the description of the layout is often confusing. For example, the spatial relationships (e.g., 'left side', 'east of the area') are imprecise and sometimes inaccurate compared to the provided diagrams. The summary lacks a clear, objective focus on the physical transformation of the farm, leading to a partial development of the task requirements.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the logical flow is frequently interrupted by awkward phrasing and unclear referencing. While some cohesive devices are used, such as 'In the north' and 'In the center', the transition between ideas is often mechanical or confusing. The use of pronouns and referential links is inconsistent, making it difficult for the reader to follow the spatial changes described. Paragraphing is present, but the internal structure of the paragraphs lacks the necessary cohesion to guide the reader effectively through the comparison of the two time periods.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is limited and often inappropriate for an academic report. Phrases like 'obtain their nutrition by grass' are unnatural and imprecise. There are also issues with word choice, such as 'technological globalization' and 'substantial figures', which do not accurately describe the map features. Some basic vocabulary is used correctly (e.g., 'solar panels', 'holiday cottage'), but the overall range is insufficient to convey the information with precision. The errors in collocation and word formation occasionally hinder the clarity of the report.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The response contains frequent grammatical errors that affect readability. There are issues with subject-verb agreement ('The two maps illustrates'), article usage ('in the east of the area'), and sentence structure ('which becomes daily of this Farm into modern'). The attempt at complex sentences often results in awkward or ungrammatical constructions. While the meaning is generally discernible, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar and sentence construction prevents the response from reaching a higher band. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly regarding spacing after periods.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.

