Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-07-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show the site of a farm in 1950 and the same site today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.



 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The following maps are describing about the alterations that took place at a farm during the time period since 1950 till now.

Overall, the farm named Beechwood developed significantly by adding new areas into it like camping field, farm shops and some other facilities such as installation of solar panels as well as construction of parking area.

In 1950, major part of the farm was allotted to sheep in the farm, which nowadays divided into different sections namely solar panels in Northeast corner besides this is now parking, also camping fields are built there as well. All the roads now used to be tracks in the past. In the Southeast direction of the farm, there was a farmhouse and place for chickens which remained unchanged.

By looking at today's map, it is clearly visible that new farm shop is founded by shortening the fruit trees side, however, soft fruits and vegetables sections are still same as no change had been made in it. In East part of the Beechwood farm, a Barn was replaced with holiday cottages and it's new location is the end of triangular road in South. As far as river is concerned, nothing new is introduced in it.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.5
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response covers the main features of the maps well, identifying key changes such as the addition of solar panels, the parking area, and the conversion of the barn into holiday cottages. The overview is clear and highlights the significant development of the farm. However, the description of the spatial changes is occasionally imprecise, such as the vague reference to 'different sections' without clearly contrasting the 1950 layout with the current one. While the main features are reported, the comparison could be more analytical by grouping the changes more logically (e.g., infrastructure vs. agricultural use) to better demonstrate the transformation of the site.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is logically organized into an introduction, an overview, and two body paragraphs. The progression of ideas is generally clear. However, the use of cohesive devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'besides this is now parking' and 'as far as river is concerned'. Referencing is occasionally unclear, particularly when describing the location of the new farm shop and the barn. While paragraphing is used appropriately, the flow between sentences could be improved by using a wider variety of linking words to connect the spatial descriptions more fluidly.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The range of vocabulary is adequate for the task, with terms like 'alterations', 'installation', and 'significantly' used correctly. There are some instances of slightly unnatural phrasing, such as 'shortening the fruit trees side' and 'nothing new is introduced in it'. The student attempts to use specific terminology related to the map, but some word choices are imprecise. While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey the meaning, it lacks the precision and flexibility required for a higher band score. The errors do not impede communication, but they do highlight a limited range of collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The student uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'The following maps are describing about' (incorrect verb tense and preposition), 'which nowadays divided' (missing auxiliary verb), and 'no change had been made in it' (tense inconsistency). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are some run-on sentences that affect readability. While the meaning is clear, the frequency of these minor grammatical slips prevents the response from reaching a higher band. More attention to subject-verb agreement and consistent tense usage would improve the accuracy.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.