Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show the site of a farm in 1950 and the same site today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.



 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The given plans illustrates the renovations occured in Beechwood farm from1950 to as of now.

Overall, the farm site has undergone tremendous changes through an effective utilisation of the available land. It has converted to a sophisticated farm from an old farmhouse. There are notable efforts for the utilisation of the available resources.

The sheep area of the old farm has been modernised through the construction of camping field and parking slots. Solar panels have also been installed in the corner of the farm as part of renewable energy production. The track has been converted as fully fledged roads. Similarly, holiday cottages were also built as part of the renovation. The farm shop constructed near the fruit trees is an another attraction in the renovated farm site.

On the contrary, the areas dedicated to fruit trees, soft fruits vegetables are conserved as it was in the past. Likewise, the chickens are also kept unchanged near to the farmhouse building.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion7.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response covers the main features of the transformation well, identifying key changes such as the camping field, solar panels, and the conversion of the track. However, the overview is slightly generic and could be more specific regarding the spatial layout. While the report is accurate, it lacks a clear comparison of the scale of change, such as noting that the farm has shifted from purely agricultural to a mixed-use commercial and agricultural site. The information is generally well-selected, but the description of the 'sheep area' being modernised is slightly imprecise as the sheep area itself was replaced rather than just modernised.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organised into an introduction, an overview, and two body paragraphs. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Similarly', 'On the contrary', and 'Likewise', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical. Paragraphing is appropriate, and there is a clear progression of ideas from the general overview to specific details. The referencing is generally clear, though the connection between the 'sheep area' and the new facilities could be more smoothly integrated to improve the flow between the old and new states.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, with some good attempts at topic-specific language like 'renewable energy production', 'sophisticated', and 'utilisation'. There are some minor inaccuracies in word choice, such as 'converted as fully fledged roads' (should be 'converted into') and 'an another' (a redundant article). While the range is sufficient to convey the meaning clearly, it lacks the more sophisticated, precise collocations that would elevate the response to a higher band. The repetition of 'utilisation' and 'farm' also limits the lexical variety.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'The given plans illustrates' (subject-verb agreement error) and 'renovations occured' (spelling error). The phrase 'as of now' is slightly informal for an academic report. While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. The use of passive voice is generally handled well, which is appropriate for describing changes in a process or site plan.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.