Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-11
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The plans below show the site of a farm in 1950 and the same site today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The plan demonstrates the Beechwood Farm, how it looked in the past year 1950, and how it looks at present.
Let's first look at the plan of Beechwood in 1950; it started with the main road on one side is river and other side was used for walking, called the track. Between the river and the track, the very first thing is fruit trees; next to that are soft fruits, and lastly some vegetables. For this, you see small trees in that corner; chickens lives they near that is a farmhouse, and near the track, a barn, while opposite to that sheep place.
Now, how it looks at present is that the tracks are now converted into the road on this side, where sheep live now; that is used as ,small coner od main to road use as the parking let over is use as camping feild and solar panels is installs and at the end near to a road parking area.the place bettween the river ans the road is as itis but only opssioti of the parking farm shop is build and other think is that a barn place is now use as holiday cottage while barn is now in between the vagetable lane and chickens.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response covers the main features of the maps, such as the conversion of the track to a road and the addition of new facilities like the farm shop and solar panels. However, the description is often confusing and lacks a clear overview. The information is presented in a somewhat disjointed manner, making it difficult for the reader to form a mental picture of the changes. While the key developments are mentioned, the lack of a clear summary and the imprecise reporting of locations (e.g., 'the place between the river and the road is as it is') limit the effectiveness of the response.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The essay is divided into paragraphs, but the internal structure is weak. The use of cohesive devices is very limited and often mechanical or misused, such as 'For this, you see...' and 'other think is that...'. The progression of ideas is not always logical, and the referencing is frequently unclear, making it hard to follow the spatial relationships between the different areas of the farm. The lack of effective linking words means the text does not flow smoothly from one point to the next.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is quite basic and repetitive. There are frequent errors in word choice and spelling, such as 'coner od main to road', 'feild', 'installs', and 'vagetable'. The student struggles to use precise terminology for describing maps, often relying on vague descriptions like 'the very first thing' or 'that place'. To improve, the student needs to focus on accurate spelling and learning specific vocabulary related to describing changes in maps, such as 'transformed', 'replaced', 'extended', or 'situated'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The response contains a high frequency of grammatical errors, including issues with subject-verb agreement ('chickens lives'), tense consistency, and sentence structure. Many sentences are fragmented or run-on, such as 'the place bettween the river ans the road is as itis but only opssioti of the parking farm shop is build'. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing or misplaced commas and periods. While the meaning is generally discernible, the frequent errors cause significant strain for the reader and indicate a lack of control over complex structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.

